庭外核实技术侦查证据的程序建构

发布时间：2018-04-28 22:28

本文选题：技术侦查 + 庭外　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：本次刑事诉讼法修正案对对技术侦查措施进行了规范，同时规定了通过技术侦查措施获得的证据在必要时可以进行庭外核实。在技术侦查概念本身就存在模糊性的情况下，对技术侦查措施进行立法规范存在适用风险，在此基础上还允许对技术侦查获得的证据进行庭外核实，显得有些冒失。面对这种情况，规范技术侦查概念，特别是建构庭外核实技术侦查证据程序成为了一个必然要求。整个程序设置秉承控制性、谨慎性的原则，以求减少其适用范围、主体、场所等。在构建技术侦查证据庭外核实程序之前必须对技术侦查概念进行规范，这是整个程序建构的前提和基础，在整个过程中，同时需要分析技术侦查证据的特殊性，，这个特殊性在某种程度上决定了后续程序设置的具体内容，是本论文的核心内容之一。概念的确定和特殊性的分析也是本文的难点。本文最大的难点也是本文最重要的部分就是程序的设置。程序的设置要注重整体性，相关问题的分析，如法庭质证特点的分析，参与场所的确定、参与主体的分析、程序过程中当事人权利的保护以及救济程序的安排，都是无法规避的问题。在设置了整个程序之后，与其相关的配套制度如证据开示制度、技术侦查证据封存制度、法律援助制度等。总之我希望通过一设置个合理的程序减少适用此程序带来的负面影响，发挥此程序的诉讼价值。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the Criminal procedure Law regulates the technical investigation measures and stipulates that the evidence obtained through the technical investigation measures can be verified out of court if necessary. In the case of ambiguity in the concept of technical investigation itself, there is a risk of applying legislation to the technical investigation measures, and on this basis, it is somewhat imprudent to allow the evidence obtained by technical investigation to be verified out of court. In the face of this situation, it is an inevitable requirement to standardize the concept of technical investigation, especially to construct out-of-court verification of evidence procedure. The whole procedure is based on the principle of control and caution in order to reduce its scope of application, subject, place, etc. The concept of technical investigation must be standardized before building out of court verification procedure of technical investigation evidence, which is the premise and foundation of the whole procedure construction. In the whole process, it is necessary to analyze the particularity of technical investigation evidence at the same time. To a certain extent, this particularity determines the specific content of the subsequent procedures, which is one of the core contents of this paper. The definition of concept and the analysis of particularity are also the difficulties of this paper. The biggest difficulty of this article is also the most important part of this article is the program setting. The procedure should be set up with emphasis on integrity, analysis of relevant issues, such as the analysis of the characteristics of cross-examination of the court, the determination of the place of participation, the analysis of the main body, the protection of the rights of the parties involved in the procedure and the arrangement of the relief procedure. They are inescapable problems. After setting up the whole procedure, the relevant supporting systems such as evidence discovery system, technical investigation evidence sealing system, legal aid system and so on. In short, I hope to set up a reasonable procedure to reduce the negative impact of the application of this procedure, to play the litigation value of this procedure.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】