浅析我国刑事法律援助制度的完善
发布时间:2018-05-01 18:33
本文选题:刑事法律援助 + 律师的刑事豁免权 ; 参考:《西北大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:刑事法律援助制度是刑事诉讼程序中必不可少的环节,设置刑事法律援助制度的目的是为了体现法律的公平正义,保护社会弱者同等享有诉讼的机会和权利。无论是发达国家还是发展中国家,刑事法律援助制度都已成为保障公民权利的基本诉讼制度,随着改革开放进程的不断深入和法治建设的日益完备,我国的刑事法律援助制度也在不断的完善和发展。但由于起步较晚,我国刑事法律援助发展相对比较缓慢,存在很多问题。本文主要从以下四个方面来论述我国的刑事法律援助制度,为我国法律援助制度的发展提供一点建议。第一部分阐述我国刑事法律援助制度存在的问题,主要包括侦查、审查起诉阶段存在的问题;审判阶段存在的问题;简易程序中存在的问题以及在刑事法律援助过程中存在的问题。第二部分阐述出现这些问题的原因,主要包括文化观念的影响、法律体系的单一、经费不足、公检法的重视程度不够等。第三部分分析比较英美德日的刑事法律援助制度,总结其中可供我国借鉴的经验。第四部分则提出完善我国刑事法律援助制度的建议,主要包括完善立法体系、建立制度机制、拓展经费来源、完善保障制度四个方面。
[Abstract]:The criminal legal aid system is an indispensable link in the criminal procedure. The purpose of setting up the criminal legal aid system is to embody the fairness and justice of the law and to protect the weak persons in the society from having equal opportunities and rights of litigation. Both developed and developing countries, the criminal legal aid system has become the basic litigation system to protect the rights of citizens. With the deepening of the reform and opening up process and the increasingly complete construction of the rule of law, China's criminal legal aid system is also constantly improving and developing. However, due to the late start, the development of criminal legal aid in China is relatively slow, there are many problems. This article mainly discusses the criminal legal aid system of our country from the following four aspects, and provides some suggestions for the development of the legal aid system of our country. The first part expounds the problems existing in the criminal legal aid system of our country, mainly including the problems existing in the investigation, the examination and prosecution, the problems in the trial stage, the problems in the trial stage, and the existing problems in the criminal legal aid The problems in summary procedure and the problems in the process of criminal legal aid. The second part describes the reasons for these problems, including the impact of cultural concepts, the single legal system, the lack of funds, the public security bureau, procuratorates, courts and so on. The third part analyzes and compares the criminal legal aid system of Britain, Germany and Japan, and summarizes the experience that can be used for reference by our country. The fourth part puts forward the suggestion of perfecting our criminal legal aid system, mainly including perfecting the legislative system, establishing the system mechanism, expanding the source of funds and perfecting the security system.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周春华,李建波;中国法律援助制度述评[J];中国司法;2004年08期
2 司法部法律援助中心刑事法律援助部调研组;关于刑事法律援助的调研报告[J];中国司法;2004年12期
3 滕丽娜;;英国刑事法律援助制度的现状及其启示[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2009年04期
4 张曙,方方;论我国刑事法律援助制度的完善[J];法学杂志;2003年02期
5 张恒山;略论和谐社会中的公平正义与法律[J];法学杂志;2005年04期
6 高贞;;论刑事被害人法律援助权及其实现[J];法学;2008年11期
7 陈斌;王晨;;我国刑事法律援助制度的缺陷和完善[J];法制与社会;2010年04期
8 梁仁伟;中国法律援助制度的现状及其完善[J];河北法学;2003年05期
9 牟逍媛;法律援助分担费用制度若干问题研究[J];华东政法学院学报;2002年03期
10 阮兰泉;;中国法律援助值班律师制度初探[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2009年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张佳;我国刑事法律援助制度研究[D];海南大学;2013年
,本文编号:1830577
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1830577.html