论最高人民法院裁判规则的形成功能——以最高院民事司法解释为分析对象

发布时间：2018-05-01 23:18

本文选题：最高人民法院 + 裁判规则　；参考：《法学》2013年11期

【摘要】：改革开放以来最高人民法院裁判规则形成功能呈现出偏重形成高度抽象规则、淡化针对个案形成具体规则,偏重裁判规则形成过程中的政府主导、淡化法院根据司法实践自发形成裁判规则.偏重裁判规则形成的推理启动机制,淡化经验启动机制的特点。最高人民法院需要强化裁判规则形成功能的目的论立场,不能忽视裁判规则形成功能的主动性,并且现有的裁判规则形成功能的抽象发挥模式并不违宪。最高人民法院裁判规则形成功能最大的正面效应是其从技术(如举证责任倒置)和理念(如强化物权债权化)两个层面形成的裁判规则有力地回应了社会转型的需要。裁判规则形成活动是在法律规则、法律原则和法律理念指导下进行的法律意义澄清和漏洞填补活动,尊重法律是裁判规则形成功能发挥的首要原则。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up to the outside world, the functions of the Supreme people's Court in the formation of adjudicative rules have shown that the formation of highly abstract rules has been emphasized, while the formation of specific rules in the light of individual cases and the government leading in the formation of adjudicative According to judicial practice, the desalination court spontaneously forms the rules of adjudication. Emphasis is placed on the reasoning starting mechanism formed by the referee rules, while the characteristics of the empirical priming mechanism are downplayed. The Supreme people's Court needs to strengthen the Skopos standpoint of the formative function of the rules of adjudication, and cannot ignore the initiative of the formative function of the rules of adjudication, and the present abstract mode of exerting the function of forming the rules of adjudication is not unconstitutional. The biggest positive effect of the formation function of the ruling rules of the Supreme people's Court is that the rules formed from the two aspects of technology (such as the inversion of the burden of proof) and the idea (such as strengthening the creditor's rights in real right) respond powerfully to the needs of the social transformation. Under the guidance of legal rules, legal principles and legal concepts, the formation of adjudicative rules is an activity of clarifying legal significance and filling up loopholes, and respecting the law is the primary principle to play a role in the formation of adjudicative rules.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“民生视野下适当生活水准权的法律保障”(项目批准号:11CFX031) 山东大学人文社会科学青年团队项目“经济、社会、文化权利的法律保障与制度实现”(项目批准号:IFYT12087)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】