我国行政诉讼变更判决研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 15:10

本文选题：变更判决 + 司法公正　；参考：《广西民族大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：变更判决是我国行政诉讼重要的判决形式之一,是司法机关监督行政机关依法行政的重要手段。改革开放以来,我国《行政诉讼法》立法取得举世瞩目的成绩,但也必须承认,我国《行政诉讼法》在具体制度设计上仍有不尽人意之处。行政诉讼变更判决在我国立法和制度方面都有相应规定,但不够完善,司法实践中也存在变更判决的适用范围窄,适用率低,司法审判受行政权影响等问题,不能发挥出其应有价值。《行政诉讼法》修改之后,进一步完善了相关立法,扩展了行政诉讼变更判决的适用范围,增加了禁止不利变更的原则,在一定程度上解决了存在的问题,对于保障行政相对人的合法权益,提高诉讼效益方面均具有极大的进步意义。在肯定修改后的《行政诉讼法》进步的同时,结合我国的司法实践,客观分析把握新法规定,分析其还存在的问题和问题产生的原因,并有针对性的提出解决问题的对策,对进一步完善我国的行政诉讼变更判决制度也是十分必要的。文章提出完善行政诉讼变更判决立法,同时完善相关配套制度,变更判决的受案范围不应束缚于实体权利领域,可向程序性领域发展的建议和构想。希望能对我国行政诉讼变更判决制度的完善和相关理论创新有所帮助。文章结构分为绪论、正文和结语三个部分。其中正文分为四章,第一章为变更判决的基础理论,概述了变更判决的概念和特征、变更判决的发展和变迁;第二章对变更判决在我国行政诉讼体系中的地位和评价进行分析,突出变更判决的立法现状及其在司法实践中的适用标准;第三章对变更判决的适用基本情况,存在的问题和问题产生的原因进行分析;第四章是文章的重点,主要总结了修法后法官在司法实践中适用变更判决应当把握的一些问题,并针对上述问题,提出完善我国行政诉讼变更判决的一些建议和制度构想。
[Abstract]:Changing judgment is one of the important forms of administrative litigation in our country, and it is also an important means for judicial organs to supervise the administration of administrative organs according to law. Since the reform and opening up, the legislation of the Administrative Litigation Law in our country has made remarkable achievements, but it must also be acknowledged that the concrete system design of the Administrative procedure Law of our country is still unsatisfactory. There are corresponding provisions in our legislation and system, but they are not perfect. In judicial practice, there are some problems such as narrow scope of application, low rate of application, judicial trial influenced by administrative power, etc. After the revision of the "Administrative Litigation Law", the relevant legislation has been further improved, the scope of application of the administrative procedural change judgment has been expanded, and the principle of prohibiting adverse changes has been added. To a certain extent, the existing problems are solved, which is of great significance in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and improving the benefit of litigation. While affirming the progress of the revised Administrative Litigation Law, combining the judicial practice of our country, this paper objectively analyzes and grasps the provisions of the new law, analyzes its existing problems and the causes of the problems, and puts forward targeted countermeasures to solve the problems. It is also necessary to improve the system of administrative litigation change judgment in our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions and ideas that the legislation of administrative litigation should be improved, and the relevant supporting system should be perfected. The scope of accepting cases of changing judgment should not be bound to the field of substantive rights, but can be developed into procedural field. It is hoped that it will be helpful to the improvement of the system of changing judgment in administrative litigation and the innovation of relevant theories. The structure of the article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the basic theory of the modified judgment, which summarizes the concept and characteristics of the modified judgment, the development and changes of the modified judgment, and the second chapter analyzes the status and evaluation of the modified judgment in the administrative litigation system of our country. Highlight the legislative situation of changing judgment and its applicable standards in judicial practice; the third chapter analyzes the basic situation of the application of the modified judgment, the existing problems and the causes of the problems; the fourth chapter is the focus of the article, This paper summarizes some problems that judges should grasp in applying the modified judgment in the judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions and system ideas to perfect the modified judgment of administrative litigation in our country.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】