当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论何为错案

发布时间:2018-05-03 20:01

  本文选题:错案 + 错案责任 ; 参考:《外交学院》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:每一件错案都是对代表着社会公正底线的司法体系的一次沉重打击。错案对于人们并不陌生,但是人们对什么是错案却始终没有一个清晰的认识。本文在导论部分介绍了错案在国内学术领域的研究方向和研究状态,对错案的讨论最初源于错案责任追究制度的实践,而对错案本身含义的探讨较少。在第一部分,本文对国内错案概念的界定学说进行了系统的梳理,主要包括客观说、主客观统一说、行为违法说和三重标准说等,在司法实践中对于错案的规定尽管各不相同,但是各规定所采取的衡量标准具有一定的共性。在第二部分,本文就错案界定中常用的标准逐一进行评析,认为以往对于错案的界定主要存在两大问题,一是易与错案责任追究的标准相混淆,二是对案件程序的监控意识薄弱。对此,本文提出从实体和程序双重标准界定错案的范围,并分别就两个标准的内涵做出阐释,第三部分,结合我国司法改革在错案和司法责任方面的最新规定,简要介绍了笔者对以错案标准为基础的纠正、责任和救济制度的构想。
[Abstract]:Every mistake is a blow to the justice system, which represents the bottom line of social justice. Misdemeanors are no strangers to people, but there is no clear understanding of what misdeeds are. In the introduction part, this paper introduces the research direction and research status of the wrong case in the domestic academic field. The discussion of the wrong case originates from the practice of the system of investigating the responsibility of the wrong case, but the discussion of the meaning of the wrong case itself is less. In the first part, this paper systematically combs the definition theory of the concept of domestic wrong cases, including objective theory, subjective and objective unity theory, illegal behavior theory and triple standard theory, although the provisions of wrong cases are different in judicial practice. However, the standards adopted by the regulations have certain commonalities. In the second part, this paper analyzes the common criteria in the definition of wrong cases one by one, and thinks that there are two main problems in the definition of wrong cases in the past, one is that it is easy to confuse with the standard of investigating the responsibility of wrong cases. Second, the monitoring of the case procedures awareness is weak. In view of this, this paper puts forward to define the scope of wrong cases from the double standards of entity and procedure, and explains the connotation of the two standards respectively. The third part, combined with the latest provisions of judicial reform in wrong cases and judicial responsibility in our country, This paper briefly introduces the author's conception of the system of correction, liability and relief based on the standard of wrong case.
【学位授予单位】:外交学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄琳;;刑事司法中民意的渗透与司法应对[J];法制与社会;2012年16期

2 张文旺;;对司法改革理论与实践中几个问题的思考[J];福建法学;2000年01期

3 季卫东;;中国司法的思维方式及其文化特征[J];法律方法与法律思维;2005年00期

4 高志刚;;论整体性衡平的能动司法——评孔祥俊的《司法理念与裁判方法》[J];法律方法;2008年00期

5 陈贤贵;;克制抑或能动——我国当下应当奉行什么样的司法哲学[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2009年02期

6 陈贤贵;洪秀娟;;徘徊在克制与能动之间——比较法视野下两种司法哲学观的对抗与抉择[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2009年04期

7 李辉;;对能动司法实践的反思——从陇县“能动主义八四司法模式”谈起[J];东岳论丛;2009年11期

8 华丹阳;;论“民意”对司法的影响[J];法制与社会;2013年02期

9 姜明安;Jia Fe;;深化司法氃制改革,推,

本文编号:1839883


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1839883.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1e997***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com