职务犯罪案件适用指定居所监视居住实证研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 22:14

本文选题：指定居所监视居住 + 特别重大贿赂犯罪　；参考：《华中师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年我国修改颁布新《刑事诉讼法》,在条文中对监视居住这一强制措施做了比较系统的、详细的规定,并且首次在法律条文中体现指定居所监视居住制度。该法律规定的出台使得我国刑事诉讼强制措施体系更富层次性,给予检察机关在职务犯罪案件侦查过程中更大的选择空间,为适用指定居所监视居住强制措施提供了法律依据,有效地促进了我国检察机关职务犯罪案件的侦查工作。然而,职务犯罪侦查工作中指定居所监视居住的适用,也暴露出我国相关立法及其应用存在有明显的不足。如何正确的理解有关法律规定,完善并准确适用指定居所监视居住制度,一直是我国学界和相关实务部门讨论的热点。笔者在文中通过运用举例、类比等方法,剖析了在实践中适用指定居所监视居住制度时所发现的诸多问题,并针对性地提出了完善对策。本文内容分为四大部分:第一部分,主要论述指定居所监视居住制度的内涵及意义。从解释指定居所监视居住的概念入手,其次比较相关概念的异同点,然后说明制定监视居住制度的意义,从三个方面解释、比较、阐明指定居所监视居住制度。第二部分,主要考察域外类似制度。将指定居所监视居住制度与不同法系的7个域外国家和地区的类似制度进行比较,并结合我国的司法现状得出相关启示。第三部分,主要列明检察机关适用指定居所监视居住的现状及存在的问题。从实践案例着手,分析部分省份的历年适用情况数据,指出在适用过程中所出现的特别重大贿赂犯罪的数额界定及认定标准不明确、特别重大的级别和重大社会影响力的界定不清晰、对无固定住处和指定的居所的规定不具体、对在住处执行可能有碍侦查的具体情形规定不全面、执行主体混淆错位、适用成本过高等若干问题。第四部分,主要阐述如何解决适用中产生问题。针对第三部分所指出实践中存在的问题,提出诸如:准确界定“特别重大贿赂犯罪”、正确界定“无固定住处”和“指定的居所”、明确指定居所监视居住执行主体、合理规范“有碍侦查情形的范围”、强化被监视居住人权益保护、加强检察机关内部制约等对策和建议。
[Abstract]:In 2012, our country amended and promulgated the new Criminal procedure Law, and made more systematic and detailed provisions on the compulsory measure of surveillance residence in the articles, and for the first time reflected the designated residence monitoring residence system in the legal provisions. The introduction of this law makes the system of compulsory measures in criminal proceedings in our country more hierarchical, giving procuratorial organs more choice in the investigation of job-related crime cases, and providing a legal basis for the application of compulsory measures of residence monitoring in the application of designated residence. It has effectively promoted the investigation work of our country's procuratorial organ duty crime case. However, the application of designated residence in the investigation of job-related crimes also reveals that there are obvious deficiencies in the relevant legislation and its application in our country. How to correctly understand the relevant laws and regulations, perfect and accurately apply the designated residence monitoring residence system, has been the focus of discussion in Chinese academic circles and relevant practical departments. By means of examples and analogies, the author analyzes the problems found in the application of the system of designated residence monitoring in practice, and puts forward some countermeasures to perfect it. The content of this paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly discusses the connotation and significance of the designated residence monitoring residence system. This paper begins with the explanation of the concept of designated residence monitoring residence, then compares the similarities and differences of the related concepts, and then explains the significance of formulating the supervised residence system, explains and compares it from three aspects, and clarifies the designated residence monitoring residence system. The second part, mainly examines the extraterritorial similar system. This paper compares the residence surveillance system with the similar system in seven foreign countries and regions of different legal systems, and draws the relevant enlightenment from the current situation of our country's judicature. The third part mainly lists the current situation and existing problems of the procuratorial organ applying designated residence to monitor residence. Starting from the practical cases, this paper analyzes the data of some provinces' application in the past years, and points out that the definition and identification standard of the amount of the especially important bribery crime that occurs in the course of application is not clear. The definition of particularly significant levels and significant social influence is not clear, the provisions on the absence of fixed residence and the designated residence are not specific, the provisions on the specific circumstances in which the execution of the residence may hinder investigation are not comprehensive, and the subject of execution is confused and misplaced. The application cost is too high and so on. The fourth part mainly expounds how to solve the problems in application. In view of the problems in practice mentioned in the third part, such as accurately defining "especially serious bribery crime", correctly defining "no fixed residence" and "designated residence", specifying residence to monitor the subject of residence enforcement is put forward. It is reasonable to standardize the scope of the investigation, to strengthen the protection of the rights and interests of the residents under surveillance, to strengthen the internal restriction of the procuratorial organ, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】