当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

民事诉讼中的先行调解制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-06 18:34

  本文选题:先行调解 + 准司法性 ; 参考:《华侨大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:无论是从多元化纠纷解决机制的发展背景,还是从具有缓解紧张的司法资源、保护争讼外利益、减少当事人诉讼对抗等价值和功能的角度上看,先行调解制度的适用都是具有较大优势的。我国新民事诉讼法第122条就是关于先行调解制度的规定。但是由于该规定概括性较强,所以一定程度上造成了司法实践中存在着尚不规范的做法。笔者试图以民事诉讼法122条规定的先行调解为研究对象,对其含义和属性、司法实践情况、制度的适用等进行分析探讨。除引言和结语外,文章结构分为四个部分。第一个部分从民诉法122条的先行调解的含义和属性入手,通过分析与相关概念的异同,来明确先行调解的含义和性质。文章第二部分阐述了美国、日本、我国台湾地区与先行调解相类似的制度,主要分析了其制度的运作及运作特点,总结了我国在先行调解制度的适用中可以借鉴的方面;另外笔者将我国现阶段司法实践中的先行调解分为三种模式,即立案调解中心的诉前模式、诉前委托调解模式和法院附设诉前调解模式,并对三种先行调解模式进行了比较分析。文章第三部分是对先行调解制度在具体运行中的问题进行分析,主要包括调解和审判关系、矛盾解决和权利保护两对内在紧张关系和司法实践中具体存在的问题。文章的第四部分从先行调解的基本原则、适用范围、程序流程、激励机制这些方面提出了笔者对于新民事诉讼法第122条的适用的构想。
[Abstract]:Not only from the perspective of the development background of diversified dispute resolution mechanism, but also from the perspective of its value and function, such as relieving the tension of judicial resources, protecting the interests outside litigation, reducing the litigants' litigation confrontation and so on. The application of the first mediation system has great advantages. Article 122 of the new Civil procedure Law of our country is the stipulation of the mediation system in advance. However, due to the strong generality of the provisions, to a certain extent, there are still some non-standard practices in judicial practice. The author tries to analyze the meaning and attribute of mediation in advance, judicial practice and the application of system, which is stipulated in Article 122 of the Civil procedure Law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the structure of the article is divided into four parts. The first part starts with the meaning and attribute of the first mediation in the 122 article of the Civil procedure Law, and clarifies the meaning and nature of the advance mediation by analyzing the similarities and differences with the related concepts. The second part of the article expounds the similar systems between the United States, Japan and Taiwan, mainly analyzes the operation and operation characteristics of the system, and summarizes the aspects that can be used for reference in the application of the system. In addition, the author divides the current judicial practice of our country into three modes, namely, the pre-litigation model of the mediation center, the pre-litigation entrustment mediation model and the pre-litigation mediation model attached to the court. In addition, three kinds of mediation modes are compared and analyzed. The third part of the article is to analyze the problems in the specific operation of the advance mediation system, mainly including mediation and trial relations, conflict resolution and protection of the rights of the two pairs of internal tension and the specific problems in judicial practice. The fourth part of the article puts forward the author's idea of the application of Article 122 of the new Civil procedure Law from the following aspects: the basic principle, the scope of application, the procedure flow and the incentive mechanism of the mediation in advance.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 潘剑锋;刘哲玮;;论法院调解与纠纷解决之关系——从构建和谐社会的角度展开[J];比较法研究;2010年04期

2 肖建华;唐玉富;;论法院调解保密原则[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年04期

3 袁煜驰;;法院调解自愿原则新解[J];法律适用;2006年12期

4 范愉;;诉前调解与法院的社会责任 从司法社会化到司法能动主义[J];法律适用;2007年11期

5 张华;赵可;;人民法院诉前调解制度的初步建构 司法ADR模式诉前调解制度合理性、可操作性探究[J];法律适用;2007年11期

6 李浩;;委托调解若干问题研究——对四个基层人民法院委托调解的初步考察[J];法商研究;2008年01期

7 赵远;;困境与出路:我国诉前调解制度改革论析[J];法学杂志;2009年06期

8 许少波;;先行调解的三重含义[J];海峡法学;2013年01期

9 赵钢;;关于“先行调解”的几个问题[J];法学评论;2013年03期

10 杨雅妮;;多元化纠纷解决机制下立案调解制度构建的再思考[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年S1期



本文编号:1853407

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1853407.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户19411***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com