庭审实质化的技术路径反思与政治路径证成

发布时间：2018-05-07 06:15

  本文选题：庭审实质化 + 技术路径　； 参考：《法制与社会发展》2017年03期

【摘要】：庭审实质化改革目前呈现一幅技术主义改革图景,取得了初步成效,也有值得反思之处。技术路径无法应对庭审实质化改革存在的法院对公安、检察机关的制度性制约能力不足这一积难问题。政治路径与技术路径互为补充、相互协作,是对技术路径无法解决的法院制约能力不足等涉及司法体制的深层次问题作出的回应和相应的政治安排。政治路径通过提高法院的政治地位和政治待遇等政治举措来加强法院的司法制约能力,从而完成庭审实质化的改革任务。根据实际情况,政治路径在中央和地方层面可以有不同的方案。
[Abstract]:At present, the reform of trial materialization presents a picture of technocratic reform, which has achieved initial results and is worthy of reflection. The technical path is unable to cope with the shortage of institutional restriction ability of the court to the public security and the procuratorial organ, which exists in the reform of the essence of the trial. The political path and the technical path complement each other and cooperate with each other, which is the response and corresponding political arrangement to the deep problems related to the judicial system, such as the insufficiency of the court's restriction capacity, which cannot be solved by the technical path. The political path strengthens the judicial restriction ability of the court through political measures such as improving the political status and political treatment of the court, thus accomplishing the reform task of the court's materialization. Depending on the actual situation, the political path can have different programs at the central and local levels.
【作者单位】： 四川大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究课题“庭审实质化的实现路径研究”(CLS(2015)C45)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2
，

本文编号：1855730