司法公正的社会认同研究
本文选题:司法公正 + 社会认同 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:伴随着人们对法律的重视以及对司法需求的日益增长,我国司法改革的脚步一直没有停歇。当前我国正处于社会转型期,经济快速增长、多重利益交融与分化、社会急剧变迁,各种纠纷大量涌现,社会矛盾不断激化。在此情形下,司法作为其中一种不可或缺的解决手段,当以更加合理、更为社会认同的方式尽可能地解决各类纠纷、化解社会矛盾,社会对司法的需求,也是推进我国法治进程的一大动力。司法改革如火如荼地进行,党的十八大作出了进一步深化司法体制改革的重要战略部署,十八届三中全会亦确立了推进法治中国建设、深化司法体制改革的主要任务。至2015年人民法院已颁发第四个五年改革纲要(2014——2018),其中更是确立了坚持司法为民、公正司法的工作主线,力图让人民群众在每一个司法案件中都能感受到公平正义。近年来,司法的能力不能满足社会需求的矛盾愈发尖锐起来,社会对司法公正的认同和信任感不断被冲击,司法公正的社会认同成为我国司法改革中不得不重视并解决的问题。本文从理论和实践两方面入手,对理论和实践中的问题加以分析,结合典型案例,在冲突中寻求提高司法公正的社会认同的举措,以期给司法改革、司法工作者进行司法活动提供一些粗浅的建议。本文主要从司法公正的社会认同的理论分析、司法公正与社会认同的内在关系、影响司法公正的社会认同的原因分析以及提高司法公正的社会认同的路径分析几个方面分别予以论证,总体分为五个部分。第一章绪论部分分为选题的缘由、研究意义、研究现状、研究方法以及创新点,从为何选择此选题研究的缘起说起,对我国关于此问题的研究现状做了大致的阐述,为正文部分的研究打好基础。第二章是关于司法公正的社会认同的理论分析,从司法公正的社会认同的背景出发,到司法公正、社会认同的理论界定,力图在理论方面有一个较为正确的把握。第三章主要分析司法公正与社会认同的内在关系,从两者的冲突和统一两大角度着手,进而对两者在法学理论和司法实践中的冲突予以剖析。第四章是对影响司法公正的社会认同的原因进行分析,主要从司法方面(包括司法主体、司法裁判和司法运行)和社会方面(包括社会主体、社会环境和其他三个方面)两大角度,对问题产生的原因进行深入的分析。第五章则是关于提高司法公正的社会认同的路径分析,笔者亦是主要从司法方面和社会方面两大角度分别阐述。在司法方面,要求提高法官的职业素养和业务水平、优化司法裁判运行和完善司法制度建设。在社会方面,要求强化认知引导机制和营造健康的社会环境,以提高社会对司法公正的认同度。
[Abstract]:With the attention of people to the law and the growing demand for justice, the pace of judicial reform in China has not stopped. At present, our country is in the social transition period, the economy grows rapidly, the multiple benefits blend and the differentiation, the society changes rapidly, various kinds of disputes emerge in large numbers, the social contradiction unceasingly intensifies. In this case, as one of the indispensable means of solution, justice should solve all kinds of disputes as far as possible in a more reasonable and socially acceptable way, and resolve the social contradictions and the needs of the society for the administration of justice. It is also a driving force in the process of promoting the rule of law in our country. With the judicial reform in full swing, the 18th National Congress of the CPC made an important strategic plan to further deepen the reform of the judicial system, and the third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee also established the main task of promoting the construction of China under the rule of law and deepening the reform of the judicial system. By 2015, the people's court has issued the fourth five-year reform outline 2014--2018, which has established the main line of the work of upholding justice for the people and just administration of justice, in order to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case. In recent years, the contradiction that judicial capacity can not meet the needs of the society has become more and more acute, and the social identity and trust of judicial justice have been constantly attacked. The social identity of judicial justice has become a problem that has to be paid attention to and solved in the judicial reform of our country. This article starts with theory and practice, analyzes the problems in theory and practice, combining with typical cases, seeks to improve the social identity of judicial justice in the conflict, in order to give judicial reform. The judicial worker carries on the judicial activity to provide some superficial suggestion. This article mainly from the judicial justice social identification theory analysis, the judicial justice and the social identity internal relations, The analysis of the reasons that influence the social identity of judicial justice and the analysis of the path of improving the social identity of judicial justice are discussed respectively, which are divided into five parts as a whole. The first part of the introduction is divided into the reasons of the topic, research significance, research status, research methods and innovative points, from why to choose the origin of the study on this topic, to do a general description of the current situation of research on this issue in China. For the text part of the study to lay a good foundation. The second chapter is the theoretical analysis of the social identity of judicial justice, starting from the background of the social identity of judicial justice, to the theoretical definition of judicial justice and social identity, trying to have a more correct grasp in theory. The third chapter mainly analyzes the internal relationship between judicial justice and social identity, starting from the conflict and unity of the two, and then analyzes the conflict between the two in the legal theory and judicial practice. The fourth chapter is the analysis of the reasons that affect the social identity of judicial justice, mainly from the judicial aspects (including judicial subjects, judicial decisions and judicial operation) and social aspects (including social subjects). Social environment and other three aspects of the two major angles, the causes of the problem in-depth analysis. The fifth chapter is about the path analysis of improving the social identity of judicial justice, the author also mainly from the judicial and social aspects of two major points of view. In the judicial aspect, we should improve the professional quality and professional level of the judges, optimize the operation of the judicial decision and perfect the construction of the judicial system. In the social aspect, we should strengthen the cognitive guiding mechanism and build a healthy social environment in order to improve the social recognition of judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴英姿;;论司法认同:危机与重建[J];中国法学;2016年03期
2 黄鑫;;司法公正的社会认同与人民法院形象塑造——关于人民法院社会形象的调查分析[J];法律社会学评论;2015年00期
3 胡平仁;刘冬泉;;司法裁判可接受性的法社会学之维[J];石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年01期
4 宋亚辉;;司法裁判追求“社会效果”的经验与理论[J];东南法学;2014年00期
5 李代华;;能动司法与司法判决的公众认同——兼论司法公信力的提高[J];中共山西省委党校学报;2013年04期
6 陈怀峰;;司法裁判的考量因素——以民意的可接受性为视角[J];江西社会科学;2013年07期
7 焦和平;;法律之内实现社会效果的合理路径——社会学解释方法的司法适用[J];河北法学;2013年06期
8 陈发桂;;网络环境下疑案裁判可接受性目标有效实现的路径[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2011年06期
9 时永才;王刚;;论司法裁判的可接受性——兼议值得当事人信赖的民事审判权运行方式[J];法律适用;2011年01期
10 陈景辉;;裁判可接受性概念之反省[J];法学研究;2009年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张飞飞;论刑法的公众认同[D];西南政法大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 涂婧媛;民愤对刑罚裁量的影响[D];昆明理工大学;2014年
2 李素娟;论司法裁判的可接受性[D];黑龙江大学;2014年
3 王晓璐;论媒体监督与司法公正的冲突与协调[D];山西大学;2013年
4 杨雪飞;论我国司法中情理与法律的冲突与协调[D];辽宁师范大学;2013年
5 胡磊;网络民意与司法公正关系研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2013年
6 余增辉;论网络舆论环境下司法公正的实现[D];广东商学院;2013年
7 黄晶晶;论司法裁判的公众认同[D];吉林大学;2013年
8 冯文婧;司法裁判的法律效果与社会效果之辩[D];山西大学;2011年
9 陈雁琴;论刑事裁判的公众认同[D];中国政法大学;2011年
10 罗兆丹;刑事裁判的可接受性研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
,本文编号:1859421
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1859421.html