论民事电子证据的法律效力

发布时间：2018-05-09 20:20

本文选题：电子证据 + 证据效力　；参考：《新疆大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：二十一世纪是一个全新的时代,互联网的发展尤为突出,人们的生产、生活较以往也发生了极大的变化。电子证据也是随着网络的出现而产生。司法实践中面对电子证据这一新生事物的态度也从刚开始的排斥转变为如今的接纳。现在在民事案件中牵涉到电子证据的情况极为普遍,我国法院对民事电子证据效力方面的认定会有一定的障碍与偏颇。首先,本文将对电子证据的概念进行了界定,从广义角度定义为以电子形式存在的并且可以作为证据的材料及派生物,从此概念中总结出三个方面的含义。对其概念有一定的了解后再归纳出不同于传统证据所具备的特征,比如依赖性、高科技性等。紧接着梳理电子证据的四种学理发展,为其成为独立的证据地位做铺垫,对其做一个客观的定位。其次,本文查阅了有关的电子证据的法律规定,介绍了西方发达国家的相关立法以及我国法律对电子证据的相关规定,让其具有一定的理论支撑,同时从我国司法实践中的案例出发,先总体上分析我国有关此类案件的现状,分析出我国面对电子证据所出现的相关问题。再次,此文将从法律实践中对认定电子证据效力过程当中概括出来的难点进行阐发,总结出真实性难以保证、取证困难、传统的举证规则不适应三大难点。最后,本文将针对民事电子证据效力认定的三大难点给出具体意见,分别为确保其真实性、规范取证程序及完善举证规则。希望能够有利于解决我国法律实践中所碰到的问题。
[Abstract]:The 21 century is a new era, the development of the Internet is particularly prominent, people's production, life has also changed a great deal. Electronic evidence is also produced with the emergence of the network. In judicial practice, the attitude towards electronic evidence, a new thing, has changed from the initial rejection to the present acceptance. Now it is very common that electronic evidence is involved in civil cases, and there will be some obstacles and biases in the determination of the validity of civil electronic evidence in our courts. First of all, the concept of electronic evidence is defined in this paper, which is defined as materials and biologic materials which exist in electronic form and can be used as evidence in a broad sense, and the meanings of three aspects are summed up from the concept. After having a certain understanding of the concept, we can conclude the characteristics which are different from the traditional evidence, such as dependence, hi-tech, etc. Then combing the development of four kinds of theories of electronic evidence, paving the way for it to become independent evidence status, and making an objective orientation to it. Secondly, this paper reviews the relevant legal provisions of electronic evidence, introduces the relevant legislation of western developed countries and the relevant provisions of Chinese law on electronic evidence, so that it has a certain theoretical support. At the same time, starting from the case of judicial practice in our country, this paper first analyzes the current situation of this kind of cases in our country as a whole, and analyzes the related problems in the face of electronic evidence in our country. Thirdly, this paper will analyze the difficulties in the process of identifying the validity of electronic evidence from the legal practice, and conclude that the authenticity is difficult to guarantee, the difficulty of obtaining evidence, the traditional rules of proof do not adapt to the three major difficulties. Finally, this paper will give specific opinions on the three difficult points of the validity of civil electronic evidence, namely, to ensure its authenticity, to standardize the procedure of collecting evidence and to perfect the rules of proof. It is hoped that it will be helpful to solve the problems encountered in our country's legal practice.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】