当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

侦查讯问同步录音录像制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-09 22:19

  本文选题:侦查讯问程序 + 同步 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:侦查讯问同步录音录像制度是在人权保障背景下,保障犯罪嫌疑人权利的有力措施。侦查讯问同步录音录像资料的性质要根据其功能及目的动态看待:在证明侦查讯问程序是否合法的问题上,同步录音录像资料是视听资料;作为犯罪嫌疑人口供的一种记录方式,同步录音录像资料是犯罪嫌疑人供述和辩解。同步录音录像资料具有同步录制性、客观真实性、反复再现性、复印件与原件的高度一致性、立体动态性以及表现形式多样化等特点。侦查讯问同步录音录像具有重要意义。对讯问程序而言,可以保障讯问程序的公正和合法;提高讯问效率;固定证据和提高口供的证明能力;防止讯问过程中的刑讯逼供。对犯罪嫌疑人而言,一方面保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法权利,另一方面减少犯罪嫌疑人翻供的现象。对侦查讯问人员而言,可以消除人们对公安机关的偏见和误解;规范侦查讯问人员的执法行为、提高执法水平;保障侦查讯问人员的合法权利。侦查讯问同步录音录像制度的理论基础包括保障人权理论、正当法律程序理论以及控辩平衡理论。域外对侦查讯问同步录音录像制度的立法规定和实践对我国具有借鉴意义。我国有关讯问同步录音、录像的规定在最高人民检察院和公安部颁布的相关规定中有所涉及。检察院于2006年在全国开展侦查讯问同步录音录像工作,随后,公安机关和法院也开始录音录像制度的实践。侦查讯问同步录音录像制度及实施中存在诸多问题,如基本法层面没有规定;适应范围过窄;缺乏中立录制主体及监督主体;没有规定讯问录音录像前的告知内容;缺少对讯问录音录像时公开性的规定;没有规定犯罪嫌疑人异议权;缺乏救济权相关规定;大部分地区经费紧张;基础设施不完善;专业技术人员缺乏;侦查讯问人员人权保障意识淡薄等。我们应该从提升侦查讯问同步录音录像制度的立法层次,规范制度设计,解决好司法实践中存在的问题等方面来完善同步录音录像制度。
[Abstract]:The system of simultaneous recording and video recording of investigation and interrogation is a powerful measure to protect the rights of criminal suspects under the background of human rights protection. The nature of the synchronous audio and video recording material for investigation and interrogation should be viewed according to its function and purpose: on the question of proving whether the procedure of investigation and interrogation is legal, the synchronous audio and video recording material is audio-visual material; As a recording method of suspect's confession, synchronous audio and video recording is the confession and explanation of criminal suspect. Synchronous audio and video recording materials are characterized by synchronous recording, objective authenticity, repeated reproduction, high consistency between the photocopy and the original, stereoscopic dynamics and diversified forms of expression. The simultaneous recording and video recording of investigation and interrogation is of great significance. As far as interrogation procedure is concerned, it can guarantee the fairness and legality of interrogation procedure, improve the efficiency of interrogation, stabilize evidence and improve the ability of proving confession, and prevent torture in the process of interrogation. To the suspect, on the one hand, the legal rights of the suspect are guaranteed, on the other hand, the phenomenon of the suspect reopening his confession is reduced. For the investigators, it can eliminate the prejudice and misunderstanding of the public security organs, standardize the law enforcement behavior of the investigators and interrogators, improve the law enforcement level, and ensure the lawful rights of the investigators and interrogators. The theoretical basis of simultaneous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation includes the theory of protecting human rights, the theory of due process of law and the theory of balance of prosecution and defense. The legislative provisions and practice of the simultaneous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation abroad have reference significance for our country. The regulations on simultaneous recording and video recording of interrogation in China are related to the relevant regulations issued by the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security. The procuratorate carried out the simultaneous recording and video recording work in the whole country in 2006. Subsequently, the public security organ and the court also began the practice of recording and video recording system. There are many problems in the system and implementation of simultaneous audio and video recording for investigation and interrogation, such as no provision in the basic Law, too narrow scope of adaptation, lack of neutral recording subject and supervisory subject, no provision of the contents of the information before the audiovisual interrogation; Lack of public requirements for audiovisual interrogation; lack of provisions on the right of dissent of criminal suspects; lack of relevant provisions on relief rights; shortage of funds in most areas; inadequate infrastructure; lack of professional and technical personnel; The consciousness of human rights protection for investigators and interrogators is weak. We should improve the synchronous audio and video recording system from the aspects of improving the legislative level of the synchronous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation, standardizing the system design, and solving the problems existing in the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D925.2

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 赖小霞;公安机关全程同步录音录像的有效运行机制研究[D];西南交通大学;2013年



本文编号:1867677

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1867677.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f45e8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com