当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国具体行政行为司法审查适时性问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-10 15:54

  本文选题:司法审查适时性 + 首先管辖权原则 ; 参考:《山东大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:司法审查适时性是行政起诉审查制度的重要组成部分,对于法院依法行使司法职能、维护公民权利具有重要意义。首先管辖权原则、穷尽行政救济原则、成熟性原则统称为具体行政行为司法审查适时性三原则,该原则的确立要求法院必须在合适的时机才能审查行政机关的具体行政行为,从而使行政机关的决定不受法院的过度干预。在行政起诉审查制度中确立司法审查适时性,是保障公民权利的必要举措,也是完善行政诉讼制度的必经之路。 本文主要从首先管辖权原则、穷尽行政救济原则、成熟性原则等方面对司法审查适时性在我国行政诉讼实践中的应用进行了详细的阐述。文章的第一部分主要是对司法审查适时性进行了整体性的论述,主要包括司法审查适时性的涵义、理论基础、价值以及确立司法审查适时性的原则等。第二部分主要是介绍了司法审查适时性的域外实践,着重分析了从美国判例中引申出的司法审查适时性三原则以及司法审查适时性在美国司法实践中的运用。文章的第三部分立足于我国的行政诉讼实践,重点论述了将司法审查适时性纳入我国行政起诉审查制度的必要性与可行性,详细分析了司法审查适时性与我国现有的行政诉讼相关制度的联系与区别。第四部分主要是对我国行政起诉司法审查适时性制度的构建进行了设想,同时探讨了司法审查适时性在具体案件中的应用。总体上说,本文是为司法审查适时性原则在我国行政诉讼中得到有效运用而进行的一次尝试。
[Abstract]:The timeliness of judicial review is an important part of the administrative prosecution review system, which is of great significance for the courts to exercise their judicial functions according to law and to safeguard the rights of citizens. First of all, the principle of jurisdiction, the principle of exhaustion of administrative relief and the principle of maturity are generally referred to as the three principles of timeliness of judicial review of specific administrative acts. The establishment of this principle requires the court to examine the specific administrative acts of administrative organs at the appropriate time. As a result, the decisions of the administrative organs are not subject to excessive interference by the courts. To establish the timely nature of judicial review in the administrative prosecution review system is the necessary measure to protect the civil rights and the only way to perfect the administrative litigation system. This article mainly from the first jurisdiction principle, exhausted the administrative relief principle, the mature principle and so on, has carried on the detailed elaboration to the judicial review timely in our country administrative lawsuit practice application. The first part of the article is mainly about the integrity of judicial review timeliness, including the meaning of judicial review timeliness, theoretical basis, value and the establishment of the principles of judicial review timeliness. The second part mainly introduces the extraterritorial practice of the timeliness of judicial review, focusing on the analysis of the three principles of the timeliness of judicial review derived from American jurisprudence and the application of the timeliness of judicial review in the judicial practice of the United States. The third part focuses on the necessity and feasibility of bringing the judicial review into the administrative prosecution review system. This paper analyzes in detail the relationship and differences between the timeliness of judicial review and the existing administrative litigation systems in China. The fourth part is mainly to construct the system of the judicial review of administrative prosecution in our country, at the same time, it discusses the application of the timeliness of the judicial review in the specific cases. In general, this paper is an attempt to apply the principle of timeliness of judicial review in administrative litigation in China.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张千帆;;行政自由裁量权的法律控制——以美国行政法为视角[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年03期

2 胡玉鸿;权力关系与行政诉讼[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);1998年04期

3 张翔;分权制衡原则与宪法解释——司法审查以及宪法法院制度下的经验与理论[J];法商研究;2002年06期

4 胡锦光;论公民启动违宪审查程序的原则[J];法商研究;2003年05期

5 薛刚凌;行政诉讼受案标准研究[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1998年01期

6 李劲;行政诉讼受案范围的局限与重构[J];法学杂志;2005年05期

7 何勤华;新时期中国移植西方司法制度反思[J];法学;2002年09期

8 沈福俊;对行政复议的司法监督:现实问题与解决构想[J];法学;2003年12期

9 郑磊;;合宪法性审查该如何启动[J];法学;2007年02期

10 张伟;;浅议我国的行政救济制度[J];法制与社会;2010年02期



本文编号:1869932

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1869932.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c7218***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com