法院院长职权结构优化论——基于《法院组织法》与《民事诉讼法》衔接的考量

发布时间：2018-05-11 16:41

本文选题：诉讼程序 + 法院组织　；参考：《现代法学》2017年02期

【摘要】：法院组织理论与诉讼原理具有深刻内在联系,从《法院组织法》与《民事诉讼法》相衔接视角考察我国法院院长职权的层级结构,可以为全面深化司法体制改革提供理论支撑。大陆法系普遍认可法院院长具有适度的司法行政权,并以不侵害审判核心事务行使为前提。就我国现实而言,法院院长职权重塑的逻辑前提是审判业务与司法行政事务科学分类。对法院院长职权应划分为审判职权、司法行政职权。在审判职权行使方面遵循与法官同权原则,限制院长程序性决定权,确立院长审案分案的一般规则及动态调整机制;司法行政职权则应保持谦抑,开列院长司法行政职权清单有助于预防权力跨界。
[Abstract]:The theory of court organization is deeply related to the principle of litigation. From the angle of connection between the Court Organization Law and the Civil procedure Law, the investigation of the hierarchical structure of the power of the president of the court in our country can provide theoretical support for deepening the reform of the judicial system in an all-round way. The civil law system generally recognizes that the president of the court has moderate administrative power and takes the exercise of the core affairs of the trial as the premise. As far as the reality of our country is concerned, the logical premise of reshaping the power of the president of the court is the scientific classification of judicial business and judicial administration affairs. The power of the president of the court shall be divided into judicial authority and judicial administrative authority. In the aspect of the exercise of the judicial power, the principle of the same power as the judge, the restriction of the president's procedural decision, the establishment of the general rules and the dynamic adjustment mechanism of the president's ad litem cases, and the modesty of the judicial administrative authority should be maintained. A list of the President's terms of reference in the administration of justice helps to prevent the crossing of powers.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：2016年度中国法学会重点委托项目“司法责任制重大问题研究”(CLS2016FLSS-ZDWT01) 2015年度西南政法大学研究生科研重点项目“司法改革背景下民事诉讼法与法院组织法的衔接研究”(XZYJS2015005)
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】