当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

贪污贿赂犯罪立案问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-15 12:49

  本文选题:贪污贿赂犯罪 + 立案 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:立案是查办贪污贿赂犯罪的开始,也是查办贪污贿赂犯罪的难题之一。在目前我国贪污贿赂犯罪立案程序中,存在诸多问题。对立案条件和标准的把握也缺乏具体的法律法规。导致在司法实践中不破不立、先破再立、错误立案等现象时有发生。对于我国贪污贿赂犯罪立案问题的研究成果也有不少,但大都是停留在设想阶段,缺乏可操作性。 本文研究了现阶段我国贪污贿赂犯罪立案的基本概念、特征、条件、标准、审查、决定、监督和救济。接着,,重点分析了目前我国贪污贿赂犯罪立案程序在立案审查、立案方式和立案监督方面存在的问题,提出了几点建议。第一,建议严格把握贪污贿赂犯罪立案条件和标准,不能过严而放纵犯罪,不能过松而侵犯人权。要正确理解立案阶段的证据标准,做好证据审查工作,为能否做出立案决定提供依据。第二,建议根据个案具体情况正确选择立案方式。第三,建议建立和健全有效的贪污贿赂犯罪立案监督机制和立案救济机制。第四,建议严格区分初查和侦查程序,完善初查程序,保障人权。希望通过以上研究,能够对我国贪污贿赂犯罪立案程序有一定的指导作用。
[Abstract]:Filing a case is the beginning of investigation of corruption and bribery crime, but also one of the difficult problems in investigating corruption and bribery crime. At present, there are many problems in the criminal procedure of corruption and bribery in our country. There is also a lack of specific laws and regulations to grasp the conditions and standards for filing a case. Causes in the judicial practice does not break not to stand, first to break and then to establish, wrong case and so on the phenomenon has occurred from time to time. There are a lot of research results on the problem of corruption and bribery in our country, but most of them remain in the stage of imagination and lack of maneuverability. This paper studies the basic concepts, characteristics, conditions, standards, reviews, decisions, supervision and remedies of corruption and bribery cases in China. Then, the paper analyzes the problems existing in the procedure of filing corruption and bribery in our country, and puts forward some suggestions. First, it is suggested that we should strictly grasp the conditions and standards of filing corruption and bribery crimes, and not indulge the crimes too strictly and violate human rights too loosely. It is necessary to correctly understand the standard of evidence at the stage of filing, and do well in the examination of evidence so as to provide the basis for making a decision on filing a case. Second, it is suggested that the case should be correctly selected according to the specific circumstances of the case. Thirdly, it is suggested to establish and perfect the effective supervision mechanism and remedy mechanism of corruption and bribery crimes. Fourth, we should strictly distinguish between initial investigation and investigation procedure, perfect initial investigation procedure and protect human rights. It is hoped that the above research will have a certain guiding effect on the procedure of filing corruption and bribery crimes in our country.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 彭凤莲;胡文静;;论受贿罪的立案标准[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年04期

2 燕星宇;丁浩;;论中国的刑事立案标准[J];法制与社会;2009年20期

3 安菁;;检察机关自侦案件的立案监督工作机制研究[J];法制与社会;2010年24期

4 王健;方荣辉;陈浙城;;浅议“以事立案”在职务犯罪案件中的适用[J];法制与社会;2010年36期

5 刘玉江;;刑事立案意义的消解与制度重构[J];江苏警官学院学报;2009年03期

6 李海清;;以人为本与职务犯罪立案监督关系辨析[J];传承;2009年18期

7 王昌奎;田维武;王勐视;;司法人员职务犯罪“以事立案”模式研究[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期

8 于敏;韩宁;;对我国刑事立案制度的重新审视[J];法制与社会;2009年34期

9 李德恩;;立案功能的冲突与立法调整[J];河北理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期

10 周标龙;;职务犯罪案件“立案难”问题探讨[J];衡阳师范学院学报;2010年05期



本文编号:1892528

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1892528.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a4370***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com