论刑事诉讼中的专家辅助人制度

发布时间：2018-05-17 06:06

本文选题：刑事诉讼 + 专家辅助人　；参考：《山东大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年修正的《刑事诉讼法》在第192条确立了专家辅助人制度,此制度的出台有着其深刻的社会背景和巨大的制度意义。专家辅助人的出现,不仅顺应了当前刑事案件科学证据盛行的趋势,而且其通过协助控辩双方对鉴定意见这一法定证据类型的质证,可以有效弥补我国现今司法鉴定制度的缺陷,实现刑事诉讼的公正价值和效率价值,从而帮助法官准确认定案件事实,作出公正审判。遗憾的是,法律规定的相对模糊、相关制度的不完善、理论界和实务界对于相关法律和司法解释理解的分歧,使得对于专家辅助人制度的相关内容远未达到共识,这导致在司法实践中此制度的运行并不顺利。如何将专家辅助人制度的诉讼价值充分发挥,解决实践过程中遇到的问题以及完善此制度是本文着重研究的内容。笔者采用比较研究法、实证研究法等,在明确相关概念和专家辅助人制度基本内容的基础之上,以刑事诉讼专家辅助人第一案、复旦投毒案和福建念斌案为样本,探讨此制度所创设的现实背景和价值意义,分析此制度在司法实践中的运行样态,以此研究专家辅助人制度在刑事诉讼中面临的困境和完善路径,并推动制度的进一步发展。文章共分为四个部分：一、刑事诉讼中专家辅助人制度的概念界定和基本内容。分析了专家辅助人这一概念的内涵,明确了在现有法律体系下专家辅助人制度的基本内容。二、我国专家辅助人制度确立的现实背景与诉讼价值。本部分从专家辅助人制度所确立的现实依据以及其制度意义出发,明确了此制度设立的迫切性和必要性。三、专家辅助人制度的理论争议与实践问题。明确专家辅助人制度运行的基本理论争议和解决此制度在司法实践运行过程中所面临的具体性问题,从而充分发挥此制度的价值功用。四、专家辅助人制度的完善。通过法律、司法解释的不断健全和相关配套制度的建立,促进专家辅助人制度的不断发展。
[Abstract]:The "Criminal Procedure Law" amended in 2012 has established the expert assistant system in the 192nd article. The introduction of this system has its profound social background and great institutional significance. The emergence of the expert assistants not only complies with the trend of the current scientific evidence of criminal cases, but also passes through the legal certificate that assists both the prosecution and the defense. According to the type of certificate, it can effectively make up the defects of our present judicial authentication system, realize the fair value and efficiency value of the criminal procedure, thus help the judge to identify the facts of the case and make a fair trial. Unfortunately, the legal provisions are relatively vague, the relevant system is not perfect, the theorists and the practical circles have related laws and departments to the relevant laws and departments. The interpretation of the differences of understanding makes the relevant content of the expert assistant system far from consensus, which leads to the operation of the system in judicial practice is not smooth. How to give full play to the litigation value of the expert assistant system and solve the problems encountered in the practice process and improve the system is the content of this paper. On the basis of the relevant concepts and the basic contents of the expert assistant system, the author uses the comparative research method and the empirical research method to discuss the actual background and value meaning created by the system in the case of the first case of criminal procedure experts, Fudan poisoning case and Fujian Bin Bin case, and analyzes the operation of this system in judicial practice. In order to study the predicament and the perfect path of the expert assistant system in criminal proceedings and promote the further development of the system, the article is divided into four parts: first, the definition and basic content of the expert assistant system in the criminal procedure. The basic content of the system of expert assistants. Two, the realistic background and litigation value of the establishment of the expert assistant system in China. This part makes clear the urgency and necessity of the establishment of this system from the basis of the realistic basis established by the expert assistant system and its institutional significance. Three, the theoretical dispute and practice of the expert assistant system. To clarify the basic theoretical disputes of the operation of the expert assistant system and to solve the specific problems faced by the system in the process of judicial practice, so as to give full play to the value function of the system. Four, the perfection of the expert assistant system. The continuous development of the system of helping people.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】