司法判决中的指导性案例

发布时间：2018-05-17 13:12

本文选题：指导性案例 + 法律适用　；参考：《中国法学》2017年06期

【摘要】：案例指导制度是我国针对法治发展的现实需要而创新的一种法律制度。经验研究发现,指导性案例的采纳适用与案件类型、案由、指导性案例的提供主体、律师代理、提供指导性案例的方式、审理程序和法院级别等有显著相关性,但与判决书的制作年份等不存在相关性。从司法适用可以看出,指导性案例进入司法判决既缺乏必要的程序保障,也缺乏有效的法律方法支持。从运作的效果来看,案例指导制度尚未有效解决制度设计与法律理念、制度运行与适用方法之间的深刻鸿沟。实证研究和法理反思均表明,任何制度的设计,不仅需要有制度运作的程序安排,也需要有娴熟的法律方法训练,更需要有成熟的理念沉淀,才能真正实现制度创新的目标和价值。从未来发展的角度看,增强指导性案例的实效,需要从程序、方法和理念等层面着手,实现案例指导制度的中国化和本土化。
[Abstract]:Case guidance system is an innovative legal system for the development of the rule of law in China. Empirical studies have found that the adoption and application of guiding cases are significantly correlated with the types of cases, the subject of the cases, the main body of the instructive cases, the representation of lawyers, the ways of providing instructive cases, the trial procedure and the level of the courts, etc. However, there is no correlation with the year of making the judgment. It can be seen from the judicial application that the guiding cases are not only lack of necessary procedural protection, but also lack of effective legal methods. From the point of view of the effect of operation, the case guidance system has not solved the deep gap between the system design and the legal idea, the system operation and the applicable method. The empirical study and legal reflection show that the design of any system requires not only the procedural arrangements for the operation of the system, but also the training of skilled legal methods, but also the need for mature ideas to precipitate. Only then can the goal and value of system innovation be realized. From the point of view of future development, to enhance the effectiveness of guiding cases, we should start from the aspects of procedure, method and concept, and realize the localization and localization of the case guidance system.
【作者单位】：中南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】