管辖权下移制度的修改与再完善——以审判权与诉权的冲突与平衡为视角

发布时间：2018-05-17 15:31

本文选题：级别管辖 + 管辖权下移　；参考：《法律适用》2014年12期

【摘要】：民事诉讼中,审判权被滥用、诉权被剥夺的现象时有发生,管辖权下移就是一个典型例证。《民事诉讼法》修改时,以"确有必要"和"报请上级法院同意"的条件限制,目的使审判权和诉权和谐共处,但"确有必要"的不确定性并不能有效杜绝审判权的扩张,报请制度还为审判权的膨胀提供了程序上的保障,导致管辖权下移制度的初衷不能真正实现。这既有程序工具主义、职权主义和立法宜粗不宜细的弊病等主观原因,也有法院的行政化、地方保护主义等现实原因,还有历史继承性、请示制度的渊源等历史原因。管辖权下移制度在当前中国确有存在的必要性、现实性和可行性,基于审判权与诉权相互依存的关系,和管辖权下移中被滥用以及诉权被剥夺的现实,应适当限制审判权,充分保障诉权,积极改进与管辖权下移相关的配套制度,才能在管辖权下移中让诉权和审判权和谐共处。
[Abstract]:In civil litigation, the right of trial is abused, the phenomenon of the right to be deprived of the right of appeal occurs, and the decline of jurisdiction is a typical example. When the law of civil procedure is amended, it is restricted by the conditions of "indeed necessary" and "request the superior court to agree", in order to make the judicial power and the right of action harmonious together, but the uncertainty of "indeed necessary" can not effectively stop the trial. The expansion of the right of judgment also provides procedural safeguards for the expansion of the jurisdiction of the trial, which leads to the fact that the original intention of the system of downshift of jurisdiction can not be truly realized. It has subjective reasons such as procedural instrumentalism, authority and legislation should be coarse and unsuitable, as well as the administrative and local protectionism, as well as the historical reasons. It is necessary, realistic and feasible, based on the relationship between the judicial power and the right of appeal, and the reality of the abuse of jurisdiction and the deprivation of the right of action. The right to trial should be properly restricted and the right to appeal is fully guaranteed and the jurisdiction should be actively improved and jurisdiction. It is necessary to move down the relevant supporting system so that the right of litigious and judicial power can coexist in the process of the transfer of jurisdiction.
【作者单位】：郑州大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】