被追诉人认罪案件程序研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 20:33

本文选题：被追诉人 + 被追诉人认罪程序　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：该篇论文共分为三个部分,第一部分是对工作实践中的四个案例予以介绍,进而对四个案例的处理情况进行分析,发现我国被追诉人认罪程序存在着一定程度上的有违程序正义的情况。第二部分是对我国被追诉人认罪程序的理论问题进行剖析,首先介绍了我国被追诉人认罪程序的立法沿革和体系现状,其次对被追诉人认罪程序的被追诉人、被害人、检察官、法官的角色定位进行了分析。通过前两部分的研究,反思我国被追诉人认罪程序存在的问题,认为我国被追诉人认罪程序存在的问题主要是没有赋予被追诉人程序选择权及律师帮助权,没有赋予被害人对程序的选择表达看法的权利,立法赋予了法院主动提出简易程序的权力,没有对规定适用简易程序后,被追诉人因为权利的部分丧失而获得的量刑补偿权。第三部分,针对被追诉人认罪程序存在的问题,提出了相应的完善该程序的设想,一是赋予被追诉人程序请求权和律师帮助权、维护被害人的诉讼主体地位,二是取消人民法院主动提出简易程序的权力,适用简易程序对被追诉人应当予以从轻处罚并规定从轻处罚的幅度。
[Abstract]:The paper is divided into three parts. The first part is to introduce the four cases in the work practice, and then to analyze the handling of the four cases. It is found that there is a certain degree of violation of procedural justice in the process of pleading guilty to the accused in our country. The second part is to analyze the theoretical problems of the plea procedure of the accused in our country. Firstly, it introduces the legislative evolution and the current situation of the system of the plea procedure, and secondly, the prosecution, the victim, the prosecutor, the prosecution, the prosecutor, the victim, the prosecutor, the victim and the prosecutor. The role of the judge is analyzed. Through the research of the first two parts, this paper reflects on the problems existing in the pleading procedure of the accused person in our country, and thinks that the main problem of the plea procedure of the accused person in our country lies in the lack of the right to choose the procedure of the accused person and the right to help the lawyer. It does not give the victims the right to express their views on the choice of procedure, the legislation gives the court the power to initiate summary procedure, and there is no right to compensate the defendant for sentencing due to the partial loss of his right after the application of summary procedure to the provisions. In the third part, aiming at the problems existing in the procedure of pleading guilty to the accused, the author puts forward the corresponding ideas to perfect the procedure. One is to give the accused person the right to request the procedure and the right to help the lawyer, so as to maintain the status of the victim as the subject of the lawsuit. Second, the people's court should cancel the power of putting forward summary procedure on its own initiative, and apply the summary procedure to punish the accused person and stipulate the range of lenient punishment.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】