人民陪审制度对行政审判独立的现实意义探究

发布时间：2018-05-20 00:26

本文选题：行政审判独立 + 行政干预司法　；参考：《广西民族大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：审判机关无法独立行使审判权是束缚我国行政诉讼发展的重要问题，严重影响了司法机关对行政案件的公正、独立审判。这一问题的存在主要是由于我国的司法机关无法完全独立于行政机关而存在，尤其是在人事和财政等重要事项中都要受到行政机关的干预，面对行政案件很难独立地做出判决。对此，我国目前主要采取提级管辖和异地管辖的方式予以解决，但这两种方法也有其不可克服的缺陷，运用不当的话甚至会成为行政干预司法的途径。人民陪审员并不受党政机关的干预，而且在西方国家，陪审制度一直扮演着约束当权者与审判者的重要角色，广泛的民众参与赋予了司法活动极高的民主性与公正性，而且，陪审员独立于司法系统，不受司法系统的人事与财政干预，也就不会受到行政机关的影响，可以更加公正、独立地参与审判活动。陪审制度以及陪审员的此种特性刚好可以弥补行政诉讼缺乏独立性的缺点，但要完美的应用于行政诉讼中，我国的人民陪审制度还需要进一步的完善，尤其要扩大人民陪审员的来源，提高人民陪审员的参审积极性，改善人民陪审员的参审方式，使得人民陪审员能够更好地运用到行政诉讼中去。
[Abstract]:The inability of judicial organs to exercise judicial power independently is an important problem that restricts the development of administrative litigation in China, which seriously affects the justice and independent trial of administrative cases by judicial organs. The existence of this problem is mainly due to the fact that the judicial organs of our country cannot be completely independent of the administrative organs, especially in the important matters such as personnel and finance, which are subject to the intervention of the administrative organs, and it is difficult to make independent judgments in the face of administrative cases. At present, our country mainly adopts the way of promotion jurisdiction and different jurisdiction, but these two methods also have their insurmountable defects, if they are not used properly, they will even become the way of administrative intervention in the administration of justice. The people's assessors are not subject to the interference of the party and government organs. Moreover, in western countries, the jury system has always played an important role in restraining the authorities and the judges. Extensive popular participation has given the judicial activities a very high degree of democracy and impartiality. Jurors are independent of the judicial system, free from the personnel and financial interference of the judicial system, so that they are not affected by the administrative organs and can participate in the trial activities more impartially and independently. The jury system and the characteristics of jurors can make up for the lack of independence in administrative litigation, but to be applied perfectly in administrative proceedings, the people's jury system in our country needs to be further improved. In particular, it is necessary to expand the sources of the people's jurors, improve the enthusiasm of the people's jurors to participate in the trial, and improve the way of the people's assessors' trial, so that the people's jurors can be better applied to the administrative proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】