论刑事诉讼非法证人证言的排除规则

发布时间：2018-05-21 11:01

本文选题：非法证据 + 证人证言　；参考：《中南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：非法取得的证人证言能否作为定案的依据,是诉讼价值观的重要体现。我国刑事诉讼法已经初步确立了非法证人证言的排除规则。首先,本文开篇介绍了非法证人证言排除规则的国内背景,研究发现相关立法尚存在缺陷,无法起到良好的排除作用。其次,本文释析了非法证人证言排除规则的相关概念,不难发现,非法证人证言的内涵及外延还比较模糊；通过分析我国非法证人证言排除规则的立法现状,将非法证人证言的表现形式归纳为以暴力、威胁方法获取,以引诱、欺骗方法收集,违反基本程序收集,以其他方法收集证言这四个方面。从制度上分析探讨其具体司法运作及存在问题,指出非法证人证言的认定关键在于精准划分引诱、欺骗的范围,在死刑案件中,违反法定取证程序所获证人证言也将被排除。并就如何正确排除非法证人证言,如何严格区分排除与补正,结合我国当前排除模式和证明标准提出设立专门救济途径的方案。最后,本文研究英美法系国家和大陆法系国家在立法和司法实践中的不同处理方法,旨在结合我国的具体国情,吸收国外优秀研究成果,提出应当在立法中确立和完善非法证人证言排除制度,并就建立相关的程序规定和保障制度提出初步设想和建议。
[Abstract]:Whether the illegal witness testimony can be taken as the basis of the decision is an important embodiment of the value of litigation. China's criminal procedure law has preliminarily established the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony. First of all, this paper introduces the domestic background of the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony, and finds that the relevant legislation still has defects, which can not play a good role in exclusion. Secondly, this paper analyzes the relevant concepts of the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony. It is not difficult to find that the connotation and extension of illegal witness testimony is still vague. The manifestations of illegal witness testimony are summarized as four aspects: violence, threats, seduction, deception, violation of basic procedures, and other methods for the collection of testimonies. From the system analysis and discussion of its specific judicial operation and existing problems, it is pointed out that the key to the identification of illegal witness testimony lies in the precise division of the scope of inducement and deception. In death penalty cases, witness testimony obtained in violation of the statutory procedure for obtaining evidence will also be excluded. And how to correctly exclude the testimony of illegal witnesses, how to strictly distinguish between exclusion and correction, combined with the current exclusion mode and proof standard of our country, put forward the scheme of setting up special relief way. Finally, this paper studies the different approaches to legislation and judicial practice in common law countries and civil law countries, in order to absorb the outstanding research results of foreign countries combined with the specific conditions of our country. The author puts forward that the exclusion system of illegal witness testimony should be established and perfected in the legislation, and puts forward some tentative ideas and suggestions on the establishment of relevant procedural provisions and safeguard system.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】