诉权视野下的民事诉讼调解制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-25 04:41

本文选题：民事诉权 + 诉讼外调解　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：调解制度本是社会救济的一种,将其融入公力救济之中成为民事诉讼调解制度是我国的司法创新。但是这种制度创新是否具有法理上的合理性,是否损害纠纷当事人的诉讼权益?很多学者都对民事诉讼调解制度进行过反思和批评,但是在笔者看来这些论证似乎都没能切中要害。大部分学者认为这一制度是合理的,只不过在制度设计上存在各种技术缺陷而已。也有学者认识到民事诉讼调解制度违背了民事诉讼规律,但究竟违背了民事诉讼什么规律,只能从各个方面和角度泛泛而谈,涉及不到民事诉讼的根本规律,这样的论证无法从根本上说明民事诉讼调解制度的不合理。本文从民事诉权角度出发,认为民事诉讼调解制度违背民事诉讼法的最高目标——民事诉权保障。对于这一观点的论证需要进行理论上的探讨分析以及比较法方面的研究,通过对民事诉权理论进行梳理,以民事诉权为视角从本质上探讨民事裁判制度和诉讼外民事调解制度的异质性,并进而说明民事诉讼调解制度的存在是对民事诉权的伤害,是不合理的民事纠纷解决机制。在此基础上笔者对我国的民事诉讼调解制度提出自己的看法:民事诉讼调解制度作为我国人民法院处理民事纠纷的传统方式有其特定的历史意义,但是随着我国法治建设进程,法律体系的日益健全和完善,民事诉讼调解制度在本质上是对民事诉权的背离这一事实愈加突出和明显。民事诉讼调解制度是一种不合理的民事纠纷解决机制,进而应当逐步将民事诉讼调解制度取消,将诉讼外民事调解制度和民事裁判制度独立开来,建立起二者独立且良好衔接的新的民事纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:The mediation system is a kind of social relief. It is the judicial innovation of our country to integrate it into the civil litigation mediation system. But whether this kind of system innovation has the legal rationality, whether damages the litigant rights and interests of the dispute party? Many scholars have introspected and criticized the mediation system of civil action, but in the author's opinion, these arguments seem to have failed to reach the point. Most scholars believe that the system is reasonable, but there are various technical defects in the system design. Some scholars have also realized that the mediation system of civil action violates the law of civil action, but what law of civil action is violated can only be discussed extensively from various aspects and angles, which does not involve the fundamental law of civil action. This argument can not fundamentally explain the unreasonable civil litigation mediation system. From the point of view of civil litigation right, this paper holds that the mediation system of civil action violates the supreme goal of civil procedural law-the protection of civil litigation right. The argumentation of this viewpoint needs to be discussed and analyzed theoretically and the comparative law should be studied, and the theory of civil right of action should be combed out. From the angle of view of civil litigation right, this paper discusses the heterogeneity of civil adjudication system and non-litigation civil mediation system in essence, and further explains that the existence of civil litigation mediation system is the harm to civil litigation right and the unreasonable civil dispute settlement mechanism. On this basis, the author puts forward his own views on the mediation system of civil litigation in our country: the mediation system of civil action, as a traditional way for the people's court to deal with civil disputes, has its special historical significance, but with the process of the construction of the rule of law in our country, With the improvement and perfection of the legal system, the fact that the mediation system of civil action is essentially deviating from the right of civil action is becoming more and more prominent and obvious. The mediation system of civil action is a kind of unreasonable civil dispute resolution mechanism, which should be gradually abolished, and the civil mediation system and the civil adjudication system should be independent. Establish a new civil dispute settlement mechanism which is independent and well connected.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.14

【参考文献】