论中国案例指导制度向司法判例制度转型的必要性与正当性

发布时间：2018-05-29 23:15

本文选题：司法判例制度 + 案例指导制度　；参考：《比较法研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：中国的案例指导制度自2010年正式建立以来,在解释法律、统一法律适用标准、规范司法行为等诸多方面都发挥了积极作用。然而,随着司法改革向纵深推进,我国现有案例指导制度所面临的问题表明其已经与实践需要不相适应,应当向司法判例制度转型。司法判例制度是与判例形成、使用和发展相关的一系列正式或非正式规则的总和,其基本价值在于实现"类似案件类似审判"、实现司法公正。司法判例制度有解释法律、补充立法和规范法官行为三大功能;具有统合案例资源、强化证成判决、实现公众法律教育、减少诉讼、促进经济社会稳定与发展和为司法改革提供平台及抓手六大作用。所以,实现当代中国由案例指导制度向判例制度转型具有必要性和正当性。
[Abstract]:Since its formal establishment in 2010, China's case guidance system has played an active role in interpreting the law, unifying the applicable standards of law, standardizing judicial behavior, and so on. However, with the deepening of the judicial reform, the problems faced by the current case guidance system in China indicate that it has not been adapted to the needs of practice, and should be transformed to the judicial precedent system. Judicial precedent system is the summation of a series of formal or informal rules related to the formation, use and development of jurisprudence. Its basic value lies in the realization of "similar cases and similar trials" and the realization of judicial justice. The judicial precedent system has three functions of interpreting the law, supplementing the legislation and standardizing the conduct of the judge; it has the functions of integrating the case resources, strengthening the evidence into judgment, realizing public legal education, and reducing the litigation. To promote economic and social stability and development and to provide a platform for judicial reform and grasp the six major roles. Therefore, it is necessary and legitimate to realize the transition from case-guiding system to case-setting system in contemporary China.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：“全面推进依法治国重大现实问题研究”(2015MZD042)的一个子课题的部分阶段成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】