论审判中心主义对重构诉审关系的影响

发布时间：2018-06-05 06:29

本文选题：审判中心主义 + 诉审关系　；参考：《法学论坛》2016年05期

【摘要】：诉审分离的功能在于有效地切断审判与侦查之间的直接联系,而刑事司法的发展历程表明,诉审关系极易脱离规范确立的发展方向,游离于刑事诉讼一般规律之外。当前诉审关系出现异化与虚化的根源是侦查权扩张的冲动和事实以及平衡构造的过度理想化,诉审同一原则的缺失和程序性权力的滥用也是诉审矛盾产生的重要原因。从外部视角看,诉审之间应以制约侦查权为基点形成分离与合力的关系,而其内部仍需以制衡与约束作为指导原则。因此,在审判中心主义的视域中,诉审关系的调整方向应是在强化诉审分离的基础上,着力构建完整的限制和约束侦查权体系,以有效保障辩护空间,维护被告人权利,诉审之间的非正式协商也应在满足内在需要的基础上严格限定其效力。
[Abstract]:The function of the separation of prosecution and trial is to effectively cut off the direct connection between trial and investigation. The development of criminal justice shows that the relationship between trial and trial is easy to deviate from the direction of development established by the norm and deviate from the general rules of criminal procedure. At present, the root of alienation and falsehood in the relation of trial of appeal is the impulse and fact of the expansion of investigation power and the excessive idealization of balance structure. The absence of the principle of the same principle of appeal and the abuse of procedural power are also the important reasons for the contradiction of the trial of appeal. From the external angle of view, the relationship of separation and resultant force should be formed based on the restriction of investigation power, while the internal system should still take checks and balances and constraints as the guiding principles. Therefore, in the perspective of trial centrism, the direction of the adjustment of the relationship between the trial and trial should be to build a complete system of restriction and restraint of investigation right on the basis of strengthening the separation of the trial of trial, so as to effectively safeguard the defense space and the rights of the accused. Informal negotiation between appeals should also strictly limit its effectiveness on the basis of satisfying internal needs.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】