论民事保护令制度

发布时间：2018-06-08 11:05

本文选题：民事保护令 + 家庭暴力　；参考：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事保护令作为防治家庭暴力问题的一种有效手段，在世界范围内被广泛应用于涉及家庭暴力的婚姻案件的审理中。许多国家与地区纷纷出台颁行专项法规或者在综合性法规中规定民事保护令制度，通过公权力介入家庭暴力案件的处理之中，着重于事前防治救济，从而更加及时有效地帮助家庭暴力受害者，为其提供事前保护，从而保护家庭暴力受害者的人身安全及合法的财产权益，取得了显著的社会效果。近年来，，我国法律界也开始逐渐关注民事保护令制度，讨论愈发激烈。尤其是李阳家暴案的出现，引起了社会的广泛关注，再一次将家庭暴力防治问题推至舆论热点。我国并无关于民事保护令制度的明确规定，但实践中的人身安全保护裁定制度及新修订的《民事诉讼法》中纳入的行为保全制度，无疑带有明显的民事保护令的痕迹。面对我国目前在家庭暴力防治司法实践之中存在的诸多问题，我国有必要借鉴部分普通法国家及周边国家地区关于民事保护令制度的立法及司法实践经验，结合中国社会实际，建立具有中国特色的民事保护令制度。全文内容大致分为五部分：第一部分概要介绍民事保护令制度，从民事保护令的概念、性质及制度价值三个方面对民事保护令的制度作了简要概述，明确民事保护令的性质应为特殊程序，而非民事强制措施；第二部分以人身安全保护裁定为重点，介绍我国目前的民事保护令制度的司法实践，分析当前司法实践中存在的问题；第三部分考查分析民事保护令制度在域外的立法现状，以美国、日本及我国台湾地区作为代表，概要介绍民事保护令制度在这三个国家的立法现状，以及相应的立法特色，以期借鉴其立法及司法实践经验；第四部分主要论述笔者对我国民事保护令制度的构想及相关立法建议，基于前文论述中我国家庭暴力防治司法实践中存在的问题，借鉴域外先进的立法及司法实践经验，从立法例、实体规范、程序规范三方面分别论述，并提出具体的立法建议；第五部分为结语，总结上文并对本文进行总结性陈述。
[Abstract]:As an effective means to prevent and treat domestic violence, civil protection order is widely used in the trial of marriage cases involving domestic violence. Many countries and regions have enacted special laws and regulations or stipulated a civil protection order system in comprehensive laws and regulations to intervene in the handling of domestic violence cases through public power, with emphasis on prevention and relief in advance. In order to help victims of domestic violence in a more timely and effective manner and provide them with prior protection, thus protecting the personal safety and legitimate property rights and interests of victims of domestic violence, it has achieved remarkable social results in recent years. Our country legal profession also begins to pay close attention to the civil protection order system gradually, the discussion is more intense. In particular, the emergence of Li Yang domestic violence case, caused widespread concern in society, once again, the prevention and treatment of domestic violence to the hot public opinion. Our country has nothing to do with the explicit stipulation of the civil protection order system, but the system of ruling on personal protection in practice and the behavior preservation system included in the newly revised Civil procedure Law undoubtedly have obvious traces of the civil protection order. In the face of many problems existing in the judicial practice of preventing and controlling domestic violence in China, it is necessary to draw lessons from the legislation and judicial practice of the civil protection order system in some common law countries and neighboring countries, and combine with the reality of Chinese society. To establish a civil protection order system with Chinese characteristics. The full text is divided into five parts: the first part briefly introduces the civil protection order system, from the concept of civil protection order, It is clear that the nature of civil protection order should be a special procedure, not a civil coercive measure. The second part focuses on habeas corpus ruling. This paper introduces the judicial practice of the current civil protection order system in our country, analyzes the problems existing in the current judicial practice, and the third part examines and analyzes the current legislation situation of the civil protection order system outside China, with the United States, Japan and Taiwan as the representatives. This paper briefly introduces the current legislative situation of the civil protection order system in these three countries and the corresponding legislative features in order to draw lessons from its legislative and judicial practice experience. The fourth part mainly discusses the author's conception of the civil protection order system and the relevant legislative suggestions. Based on the problems in the judicial practice of domestic violence prevention and control in China, the author draws lessons from the foreign advanced legislation and judicial practice experience. From the legislative examples, substantive norms, procedural norms of three aspects, respectively, and put forward specific legislative proposals; the fifth part is the conclusion, summing up the above and the conclusion of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】