证人调查:民事庭外作证的立法向度

发布时间：2018-06-09 14:38

本文选题：民事诉讼 + 庭外作证　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年01期

【摘要】：民事诉讼法规定的庭外作证,其程序功能已经异化为降低司法成本为主,弱化了证据调查作用,致使庭外证言的正当性、可信性严重不足,程序运作流于形式。相应的制度完善应当坚持证人调查为中心的转向,将庭外作证的条件、作证方式两部构造模式,充实为条件、作证方式、调查措施三部构造模式,以使庭外作证程序功能回归到事实查明的根本。通过委托调查等手段扩充证人调查的司法资源,针对不同庭外作证方式运用直接与间接的证人调查措施,为庭外作证情况下各项程序价值的平衡提供有效的制度保障。
[Abstract]:The procedural function of out-of-court testimony stipulated by the Civil procedure Law has been dissimilated to reduce the judicial cost, weakening the evidence investigation function, resulting in the legitimacy and credibility of the testimony out of court, and the procedure operation being a mere formality. The corresponding system perfection should insist on the turning of witness investigation as the center, and make out of court the condition of testifying, the mode of testifying two parts of construction mode, the enrichment of condition, the mode of testifying, and the measure of investigation. In order to make out-of-court testifying procedure function to return to the fact to find out the root. The judicial resources of witness investigation are expanded by means of entrusted investigation, and direct and indirect witness investigation measures are applied to different ways of testifying out of court, which provides an effective system guarantee for the balance of the value of each procedure in the case of out-of-court testimony.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学法政学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目(15BFX068)“民事证人庭外作证体系研究” 教育部人文社科规划基金一般项目(14YJA820013)“民事诉讼视听传输技术作证研究”
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】