论我国民事诉讼转型中的诚信原则

发布时间：2018-06-10 18:22

本文选题：民事诉讼转型 + 诚信原则　；参考：《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：我国既往的研究忽视了诚信原则与民事诉讼转型的内在勾连。受制于民事诉讼转型,2012年修法中诚信原则的确立略显仓促,造成法条安排欠妥、内容欠明晰、定位模糊。诚信原则不仅要调整当事人的诉讼行为,还要在实用主义倾向上更进一步。通过其创造性适用来推进民事诉讼的转型,既应由法官能动地对重大的程序性利益争端行使自由裁量权进行裁判,也应防止法官在程序性纷争的裁判中出现"突袭性裁判",还应由检察机关本着诚信原则对法院的裁判行为予以监督,同时,要接受来自上一级检察机关乃至最高人民检察院的监督。诚信原则首先要通过民事诉讼的个案适用予以落实,最终要靠最高人民法院、最高人民检察院的指导性案例予以推广。
[Abstract]:Previous studies in China have ignored the inherent connection between the principle of good faith and the transformation of civil litigation. Subject to the transformation of civil litigation, the establishment of the principle of good faith in the revision of the law in 2012 is somewhat hasty, resulting in improper arrangement of the articles of law, unclear content and vague positioning. The principle of good faith not only adjusts the litigant's action, but also goes further in pragmatism. To promote the transition of civil action through its creative application, the judge should exercise the discretion to judge the important procedural interest dispute. It is also necessary to prevent judges from appearing in the adjudication of procedural disputes, and the procuratorial organs should supervise the court's adjudication in the principle of good faith, at the same time, To accept supervision from the higher level of procuratorial organs and even the Supreme people's Procuratorate. The principle of good faith should be put into practice through the application of individual cases in civil proceedings, and finally it should be popularized by the guiding cases of the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究一般项目:“法治与德治并重下刑事诉讼的诚信机制研究”(15SFB2022) 2016年中国法学会部级课题:“我国刑事诉讼转型中的协商性司法研究”(CLS-2016-D119)
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】