我国区际刑事司法合作的实践与发展

发布时间：2018-06-12 12:54

本文选题：区际刑事司法合作 + 个案协查机制　；参考：《国家检察官学院学报》2013年05期

【摘要】：目前,内地与港澳特别行政区之间的区际刑事司法合作,仍然遵循回归前形成的"个案协查"的模式,尚未签署刑事司法制度性协议安排,致使我国区际刑事司法合作面临诸多法律障碍。相比之下,港澳地区已与美、英、法等20多个国家缔结了司法合作协议,并开展了多方面的司法合作实践。因此,我们应当以香港、澳门《基本法》为依据,先将在实践中形成的"个案协查"工作机制法制化,再在此基础上逐步推动内地与港澳特别行政区的刑事司法协助安排、逃犯移交安排和被判刑人移管安排的签署。同时,应认真探索在"一国两制"下具有我国特色的区际逮捕令制度,探讨跨区域犯罪共同打击和惩治的措施安排。
[Abstract]:At present, the inter-regional criminal judicial cooperation between the mainland and the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative regions still follows the pattern of "case investigation" formed before the reunification, and has not yet signed a criminal justice institutional agreement arrangement. As a result, China's inter-regional criminal judicial cooperation faces many legal obstacles. In contrast, Hong Kong and Macao have concluded judicial cooperation agreements with more than 20 countries, such as the United States, Britain and France, and have carried out various judicial cooperation practices. Therefore, on the basis of the basic Law of Hong Kong and Macao, we should first legalize the working mechanism of "case coordination investigation" formed in practice, and then, on this basis, step by step promote the arrangement of judicial assistance in criminal matters between the mainland and the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative regions. Signature of arrangements for the surrender of fugitives and transfer of sentenced persons. At the same time, we should seriously explore the inter-regional arrest warrant system with Chinese characteristics under "one country, two systems", and explore the measures to combat and punish cross-regional crimes.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学国际刑法研究所;
【基金】：2011年度国家社会科学基金项目“《联合国反腐败公约》在中国适用问题研究”阶段性研究成果,批准号为11BFX137
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】