我国民事诉讼证明妨碍规制研究

发布时间：2018-06-14 00:47

本文选题：民事诉讼证明妨碍 + 构成要件　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：在如今的“民事诉讼爆炸”年代,面对繁杂的诉讼纠纷,一个健全的诉讼机制是保障诉讼价值实现的必备要件。随着我国对当事人主体地位的逐渐重视,经常会有一些当事人在积极履行自己举证责任的同时,为获得不当利益,实施特定行为,妨碍对方当事人公平利用证据的权利,从而损害对方当事人的利益。这样,证明妨碍规制制度就显得尤为重要了。该制度的设立不仅能维护当事人的合法权益、保障司法公正,更能优化资源配置,减轻法院调查取证的负担。针对论题,全文除引言与结语外,共分四个部分进行论述。第一部分是民事诉讼证明妨碍规制制度的概述,主要论述了民事诉讼证明妨碍的概念、构成要件以及规制证明妨碍的法理基础。第二部分介绍了两大法系的主要代表国美国、德国、日本及中国台湾地区对民事诉讼证明妨碍规制制度的相关规定,从比较法的角度分析这些国家和地区的民事诉讼证明妨碍规制制度相同相异之处和特点,以图在我国完善证明妨碍规制制度时可以进行有益的借鉴。第三部分阐释我国民事诉讼证明妨碍规制制度的演进与现状。首先,简要概括了我国关于该制度的立法发展。其次,分析我国现行该制度存在的问题。最后,对这些问题存在的原因进行分析。第四部分内容为完善我国民事诉讼证明妨碍规制制度的举措。在前三部分的基础之上,结合我国该制度存在的问题,提出了具体的完善建议。
[Abstract]:In the era of "civil litigation explosion", a sound litigation mechanism is an essential element to guarantee the realization of litigation value in the face of complicated litigation disputes. With the gradual attention to the subject status of the parties in our country, there are often some parties who actively perform their burden of proof, in order to obtain improper interests, carry out specific acts, hinder the other party's right to use the evidence fairly. In order to harm the interests of the other party. In this way, the proof hinders the regulation system to appear to be particularly important. The establishment of this system can not only safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, protect judicial justice, but also optimize the allocation of resources and lighten the burden of court investigation and evidence collection. In view of the topic, the full text is divided into four parts in addition to the introduction and conclusion. The first part is an overview of the system of civil litigation proof hindrance, mainly discusses the concept of civil litigation proof obstruction, the constituent elements and the legal basis of the regulation of proof obstruction. The second part introduces the main representative countries of the two major legal systems, the United States, Germany, Japan and Taiwan in civil proceedings against the relevant provisions of the regulatory system. From the perspective of comparative law, this paper analyzes the differences and characteristics of the civil litigation proof hindrance regulation system in these countries and regions, in order to make useful reference when perfecting the proof hindrance regulation system in our country. The third part explains the evolution and present situation of civil litigation proof hindering the regulation system. First of all, it briefly summarizes the legislative development of this system in China. Secondly, analyze the existing problems of this system in our country. Finally, the causes of these problems are analyzed. The fourth part is to perfect our country's civil lawsuit proof hinders the regulation system. On the basis of the first three parts, combined with the existing problems of this system in our country, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】