行政诉讼原告资格审查机制的正当化改造

发布时间：2018-06-16 08:53

本文选题：原告资格审查 + 诉讼程序模式　；参考：《法学》2017年04期

【摘要】：原告资格要件是行政之诉的合法性要件之一,域外通行的做法是将其作为实体判决要件在立案登记之后审查。在主、客观两种行政诉讼程序模式下,原告资格的审查标准有所不同,客观诉讼程序特征更突出的我国行政诉讼却适用了主观诉讼原告的起诉资格标准。原告资格审查时段因立案模式的不同而有所区别,在我国立案登记制下的行政起诉与受理程序中,法院在立案登记前仍须审查起诉人的原告资格。我国行政诉讼法将原告资格前置为起诉条件的制度安排欠缺程序正当性,必须作优化改革。在再次修法将原告资格审查时段后移不太现实的情况下,我国有必要先行制定或修订司法解释,明确规定立案登记时采用"可能性"审查标准,并适用"参与型"原告资格审查程序。
[Abstract]:The qualification of plaintiff is one of the legal elements of administrative action, and the overseas practice is to examine it as an element of substantive judgment after the registration of the case. Under the subjective and objective two kinds of administrative litigation procedure mode, the examination standard of plaintiff's qualification is different, but the subjective litigation plaintiff's suing qualification standard is applied in our country's administrative litigation which has more prominent objective procedural characteristics. The period of plaintiff qualification examination is different according to the mode of filing. In the administrative prosecution and accepting procedure under the registration system of our country, the court still has to examine the plaintiff's qualification before filing and registering. The system arrangement in which the plaintiff's qualification is placed before the prosecution condition in our administrative procedure law lacks procedural legitimacy and must be optimized and reformed. Under the circumstance that it is not realistic to amend the law again, it is necessary for our country to formulate or revise the judicial interpretation first, and clearly stipulate that the "possibility" examination standard should be adopted when filing for registration. And the application of the "participating" plaintiff qualification examination procedures.
【作者单位】：西南大学法学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:SWU1409416)
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】