民间借贷虚假诉讼的法律规制

发布时间：2018-06-16 22:18

本文选题：虚假诉讼 + 借贷纠纷　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：虚假诉讼是近年来出现在中国司法领域的一种负面诉讼现象。严重影响了法院正常的审判程序,并造成了极坏的社会影响。尤其是随着中国经济的发展,社会对资金的需求量不断增加,我国民间借贷迅速发展。导致在民间借贷中频繁出现虚假诉讼的现象,严重危害司法权威与司法公正。虽然全国各地各级法院相继出台关于处理民间借贷虚假诉讼案件的措施。但因为没有形成一套完善的针对民间借贷虚假诉讼问题的立法及司法体系,民间借贷虚假诉讼案件一直屡禁不止。本文试图结合作者审判实践,针对民间借贷虚假诉讼案件的特征、危害,形成一套较为有效的防范民间借贷虚假诉讼的法律规制体系。本文共分为四章,第一章主要讨论民间借贷虚假诉讼的概念及特征。通过分析民间借贷虚假诉讼的概念及特征,可以更好的识别此类案件。同时,针对民间借贷案件的特征,可制定出更具有针对性的法律规制措施。第二章为民间借贷虚假诉讼的困局。从民间借贷虚假诉讼屡禁不止的原因及亟待解决的问题两个方面展开论述。诚信观念的缺失是民间借贷虚假诉讼产生的主观原因,而对对违法利益的追逐则是民间借贷虚假诉讼案件出现的根源。防范民间借贷虚假诉讼案件,亟待解决两方面的问题。首先,要解决对该类案件缺乏相应的民事赔偿责任制度,民事处罚力度不足的问题。其次,要解决刑事处罚手段的空缺,威慑力不足的问题。第三章是民间借贷虚假诉讼的立法规制。主要从立法角度分析如何有效规制民间借贷虚假诉讼案件。建议在《民事诉讼法》中增加诚实信用原则条款：完善第三人诉讼制度,保障第三人及时参与诉讼的权利,及时阻止虚假诉讼行为,防止司法资源的严重浪费；建立民间借贷虚假诉讼侵权损害赔偿制度,增加违法成本；制定单独针对民间借贷虚假诉讼问题的特别法,增强法律的针对性。刑事立法方面,可以通过修改《刑法》第六章第二节关于“妨害司法罪”的规定,或通过出台相关司法解释的方式,将虚假诉讼作为一种妨害司法的行为,追究行为人的刑事责任。第四章为民间借贷虚假诉讼的司法应对及防范。通过加强立案警示和审查；强化庭审阶段的甄别；完善审判监督程序；建立、完善诚信机制等措施更加有效的规制民间借贷虚假诉讼。通过从理论上论述民间借贷虚假诉讼的概念、特征、危害，，并结合审判实践对于民间借贷虚假诉讼的立法规制及司法防范进行了比较详细的阐述,比如通过再审程序纠正错误判决；加强案件的立案审查制度,严格审查立案材料,对于民间借贷案件证据材料不全,无法证实当事人诉讼请求的案件,可以告知其诉讼风险,并建议当事人补足证据后再行立案；将民间借贷虚假诉讼行为纳入个人征信档案,以便于法院在立案以及案件审理过程中予以参考。希望对完善民间借贷虚假诉讼的立法及防范此类案件的发生,有一定的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:This article is divided into four chapters , the first chapter mainly discusses the concept and characteristics of the false litigation of the private borrowing .
To establish a system of compensation for damages for civil loans and false litigation , and to increase the illegal cost ;
In the aspect of criminal legislation , the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator can be investigated by modifying the provisions of Chapter 6 of Chapter 6 of the Criminal Law , or by introducing relevant judicial explanations . Chapter IV is the judicial response and prevention of the false litigation of civil loans . The fourth chapter provides the judicial response and prevention of the false litigation of civil loans .
Strengthening the screening of the trial stage ;
Improve the judicial supervision procedure ;
This paper discusses the concept , characteristics and harm of the false litigation of the private borrowing from the theory , and makes a more detailed explanation on the legal system and the judicial prevention of the false litigation of the private borrowing by combining the trial practice , such as correcting the wrong judgment through the retrial procedure ;
Strengthen the case investigation system , strictly examine the case materials , do not complete the evidence materials of the civil loan cases , can not confirm the case of the party ' s litigation request , can inform the party of the lawsuit risk , and suggest the parties to make up the case after the evidence is completed ;
It can be used as a reference for the perfection of the legislation of the false litigation of civil loans and the prevention of the occurrence of such cases .
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】