刑事违法所得没收程序研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 00:18

本文选题：财产没收 + 证据规则　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国贪污腐败案件,恐怖活动犯罪案件中,犯罪嫌疑人,被告人逃匿、死亡的现象经常出现,不得不导致诉讼程序终结,法庭无法审判,犯罪财产无法追回,国家财产流失海外,被害人的正当权益得不到保障,为了弥补这些缺陷,2012年《刑事诉讼法》第五编第三章增设了一项特别程序即犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得没收程序,随后,出台《高法解释》、《高检规则》等文件进一步对该程序加以完善。然而,现行法律对违法所得没收程序规定条文太少,同时,实践中又缺少审判经验。这也是违法所得没收程序自创立以来在理论上存在不少争议的原因,特别是审判适用过程中的工作机制,如审理范围的限定,违法所得证明标准,救济程序等方面有不合理之处。总而言之,这一特殊制度的设立无疑具有积极意义,但存在适用上的缺陷。在达成这一共识的前提下,就可以对这个特殊程序存在的缺陷在理论上加以探讨,提出作者的建议,使程序在此基础上更加完善。全文主要分为四部分。第一部分介绍违法所得没收程序概述。从违法所得没收程序的概念、理论基础进行阐述。第二部分阐述我国违法所得没收程序的现状与缺陷,通过分析违法所得没收程序立法的背景,总结没收程序存在的必要性和积极意义,然后阐释违法所得没收程序的立法现状及缺陷,最后说明违法所得没收程序缺陷成因分析。第三部分阐述两大法系违法所得没收程序制度比较分析及启示,首先分析国外各国做法,通过阐述国外没收程序,总结对我国没收程序的启示。第四部分是完善我国违法所得没收程序的途径,主要对完善相关配套措施进行论述。
[Abstract]:In corruption cases and terrorist crimes in our country, the phenomenon of criminal suspects and defendants fleeing and hiding, death often occurs, which has to lead to the end of the proceedings, the court cannot be tried, and the criminal property cannot be recovered. In order to make up for the loss of state property overseas and the lack of protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the victims, a special procedure, namely, criminal suspects, was added in chapter III of part V of the Criminal procedure Code in 2012. The procedure of confiscation of illegal income in death cases was further improved by the introduction of the interpretation of the High Law and the rules of High Inspection. However, the current law provides too few provisions for the procedure of confiscation of illegal income, at the same time, there is a lack of trial experience in practice. This is also the reason why the procedure for confiscating illegal income has been controversial in theory since its inception, especially the working mechanism in the course of trial application, such as the limitation of the scope of the trial, the standard of proof of illegal income, There is unreasonable relief procedure. In a word, the establishment of this special system is undoubtedly of positive significance, but there are some defects in its application. On the premise of reaching this consensus, the defects of this special procedure can be discussed in theory, and the author's suggestion is put forward to make the procedure more perfect on this basis. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the procedure of confiscation of illegal income. From the illegal income confiscation procedure concept, theoretical basis to elaborate. The second part expounds the current situation and defects of the procedure of confiscation of illegal income in China, and summarizes the necessity and positive significance of the procedure by analyzing the background of the legislation of the procedure of confiscation of illegal income. Then it explains the legislative status and defects of the illegal income confiscation procedure, and finally explains the causes of the defects of the illegal income confiscation procedure. The third part describes the two major legal systems of illegal income confiscation procedures comparative analysis and inspiration, first of all, analysis of the practices of foreign countries, through the elaboration of foreign confiscation procedures, summed up the inspiration to our confiscation procedures. The fourth part is the way to perfect the procedure of illegal income confiscation in China.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】