类型化视野下行政诉讼目的新论

发布时间：2018-06-19 11:49

本文选题：行政诉讼目的 + 主观诉讼　；参考：《当代法学》2017年06期

【摘要】：任何一种法律制度都含有特定的目的追求,法律目的在法律制度的生命周期中都发挥着至关重要的作用。关于行政诉讼的目的,我国学界一直以来都是众说纷纭、莫衷一是。事实上,行政诉讼得区分为主观的抗告诉讼、客观的抗告诉讼和当事人诉讼等具体类型,行政诉讼的目的也需要依据不同的诉讼类型分别论定。主观抗告诉讼的目的旨在救济权利,客观抗告诉讼的目的仅为监督行政,当事人诉讼的目的在于解决纠纷。就我国现行《行政诉讼法》所确立的诉讼类型而言,是以主观的抗告诉讼为核心,以客观的抗告诉讼为例外。由此可见,我国行政诉讼的目的是以救济权利为主,以监督行政为辅,但并不具有解决纠纷的目的。进而,强调行政诉讼的权利救济目的,不仅有助于我国《行政诉讼法》的实施走出传统困境,而且对于行政诉讼制度的科学、合理设计,对于解决我国当下行政诉讼实践中面临的滥用诉权这一突出问题,都具有重要助益。
[Abstract]:Any kind of legal system contains the pursuit of specific purpose, and legal purpose plays a vital role in the life cycle of legal system. As for the purpose of administrative litigation, Chinese academic circles have always had different opinions and different opinions. As a matter of fact, administrative litigation can be divided into subjective action, objective action and litigant action, and the purpose of administrative litigation should be determined according to different types of litigation. The purpose of subjective action against prosecution is to remedy the right, the purpose of objective action is to supervise the administration, and the purpose of litigant action is to resolve the dispute. As far as the types of litigation established in the current Administrative procedure Law are concerned, the core of the litigation is the subjective action against prosecution, with the exception of the objective action against the suit. It can be seen from this that the purpose of administrative litigation in our country is to give priority to the right of relief and to supervise the administration, but it does not have the purpose of resolving disputes. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the purpose of right relief in administrative litigation is not only helpful for the implementation of the Administrative procedure Law in our country to get out of the traditional predicament, but also for the scientific and reasonable design of the administrative litigation system. It is of great help to solve the prominent problem of abusing the right of action in the practice of administrative litigation in our country.
【作者单位】：上海大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目《预防性行政诉讼研究》(11YJC820176)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】