执行和解的法解释论展开——《民事诉讼法》第230条评注

发布时间：2018-07-06 07:12

本文选题：狭义执行和解 + 广义执行和解　；参考：《当代法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：我国的执行和解已经具备了法解释论研究的条件。一方面,2016年《民诉法解释》的新规定揭示了执行和解的公法性质,并与既有司法解释一起划定了执行和解的主客观范围。另一方面,最高人民法院的先例性裁判对法律和司法解释进行了法律续造,阐明了执行和解的效力瑕疵与效力解除问题上法律文本的含糊表达。站在法解释论的角度,应当认为中国法的执行和解制度已经基本完成了体系性构建。在这种背景下,本文尝试从法律文本、司法实践中归纳出中国法内生的法律规则,并将各个法律规则与德国法、日本法的相关理论进行比较后,借助法律评注(Kommentar)的写作体例,把立法、学理、司法等各种解释论资源涵摄于《民事诉讼法》第230条的法律文本之下。
[Abstract]:The enforcement reconciliation in our country has already possessed the conditions for the study of the theory of interpretation of law. On the one hand, the new provisions of the Civil procedure Law in 2016 reveal the nature of public law in the enforcement of reconciliation, and together with the existing judicial interpretations, delineate the subjective and objective scope of the enforcement of reconciliation. On the other hand, the precedent judgment of the Supreme people's Court continues the legal interpretation of the law and judicial interpretation, and clarifies the vague expression of the legal texts on the issue of the blemish of the effect of the enforcement settlement and the issue of the rescission of the validity. From the angle of legal interpretation, it should be considered that the system of enforcement and reconciliation of Chinese law has basically completed its systematic construction. Under this background, this paper tries to sum up the endogenous legal rules of Chinese law from the legal text and judicial practice, and compares each legal rule with the relevant theories of German law and Japanese law, and then makes use of the writing style of Kommentar. The resources of legislation, theory, judicature and so on are included in the legal text of Article 230 of the Civil procedure Law.
【作者单位】：日本一桥大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.18

【相似文献】