羁押必要性审查问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 14:02

本文选题：捕后羁押 + 羁押必要性审查　；参考：《河北大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国刑事诉讼中,羁押并非一种法定的独立强制措施,而是适用刑事拘留与逮捕时的一种当然状态。羁押必要性审查是司法机关行使羁押权,并负责解释说明的制度。简而言之处于羁押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人是否继续被羁押是由人民检察院进行审查,并负责解释说明不必要继续羁押或者变更其他强制措施的事由。羁押必要性审查制度的建立能更好地发挥监督“以捕代罚”现象的功效,是监察机关自我监督的重要表现,其主要作用体现在尽量避免超期、非法羁押:降低司法过程中的失误;不断保护犯人的人权等。由于我国《刑事诉讼法》对羁押必要性审查制度只做了原则性规定,使得有些规定过于模糊,并且对审查主体、审查方式、审查范围、审查内容、审查期限等均未予以明确。对此,尽管2013年修订的《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》(试行)对上述问题做了一定规定,但仍然未能有效解决其可操作性不强的问题,致使羁押必要性审查制度的功能并没有得到充分发挥。因此,有必要针对我国刑事诉讼中羁押必要性审查制度及其适用所存在的相关问题进行深入分析和研究,以提出进一步完善我国羁押必要性审查制度和解决制度适用中相关问题的对策。本文对分析研究羁押必要性审查制度主要分为四大部分,第一部分从基本理论角度对羁押必要性审查制度进行梳理和探讨,包括羁押必要性审查制度的概念、特点以及该制度存在的依据和意义。第二部分主要是从考察国内外现有的羁押必要性审查制度的立法体制和制度规范上入手,在分析和对比国内外制度差异的基础上,着重探讨了国外羁押必要性审查制度的有益经验对进一步完善我国羁押制度的启示。第三部分主要通过对我国羁押必要性审查制度的演进发展的介绍并结合2016年最高人民检察院颁布的《人民检察院办理羁押必要性审查案件规定(试行)》的规定,深入探讨了我国羁押必要性审查程序中存在的问题。第四部分主要是针对我国羁押必要性审查制度的缺陷提出相应的改进完善的意见和建议。
[Abstract]:In criminal proceedings in China, custody is not a statutory independent coercive measure, but a natural state of criminal detention and arrest. The examination of the necessity of custody is a system that the judicial authorities exercise the power of custody and are responsible for explaining. In short, whether the accused continues to be detained or not is examined by the people's Procuratorate and is responsible for explaining the reasons for the unnecessary detention or the alteration of other coercive measures. The establishment of the system of examining the necessity of custody can play a better role in supervising the phenomenon of "arrest as a substitute for punishment", which is an important manifestation of self-supervision by supervisory organs. Its main function is to avoid exceeding the period as far as possible. Illegal detention: reduce judicial errors; constantly protect the human rights of prisoners. Because the Criminal procedure Law of our country has only made the principle stipulation to the necessity examination system of custody, some provisions are too vague, and the subject, the way, the scope, the content and the time limit of the examination are not clear. In this regard, although the Criminal procedure rules of the people's Procuratorate revised in 2013 (on a trial basis) have made certain provisions on the above-mentioned issues, they have still failed to effectively solve the problem of their lack of maneuverability. As a result, the function of the necessity examination system of custody has not been given full play. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct in-depth analysis and research on the relevant problems existing in the examination system of the necessity of custody and its application in criminal proceedings in China. In order to further improve the necessity of detention review system and solve the relevant problems in the application of the system countermeasures. This article mainly divides into four parts to analyze and study the necessity of custody review system. The first part is to comb and discuss the necessity of custody review system from the basic theoretical point of view, including the concept of the necessity of custody review system. Characteristics and the basis and significance of the existence of the system. The second part is mainly from the review of the existing domestic and foreign detention necessity review system legislative system and system norms, on the basis of analyzing and comparing the differences between domestic and foreign systems. This paper probes into the beneficial experience of the examination system of the necessity of detaining in foreign countries and the enlightenment of perfecting the detaining system in our country. The third part mainly through the introduction of the evolution and development of the necessity examination system of custody in our country and the stipulation of "the provisions of the people's Procuratorate on the necessity of Detention Review cases (trial)" promulgated by the Supreme people's Procuratorate in 2016. This paper probes into the problems existing in the procedure of examining the necessity of custody in our country. The fourth part is to put forward the corresponding suggestions and suggestions for the defects of the necessity examination system of custody in our country.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】