排除合理怀疑标准的司法适用

发布时间：2018-07-07 19:08

本文选题：合理怀疑 + 经验法则　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：证明标准堪称证据法中的灵魂，它直接关系到刑事判决的质量和司法公正的实现。如何正确地理解和运用证明标准可谓是司法实践中的一个难题。新刑事诉讼法将排除合理怀疑吸收为证明标准的一部分，使其成为证据确实、充分的一种解释，，这就要求在判断证据确实、充分时要达到排除合理怀疑的程度。在此大背景下，探讨排除合理怀疑标准的内涵以及适用方法意义重大。本文正文包括四部分，总计一万九千余字。主要内容如下：第一部分探讨了中国排除合理怀疑标准的由来。阐述了排除合理怀疑标准如何从被批判的角色一步步地为学者所认同并最终被立法者所采纳，为下一部分阐释排除合理怀疑标准的内涵和司法适用确立一个宏观知识背景。第二部分阐释了排除合理怀疑标准的内涵，并着重论述其在司法实践中的具体操作步骤。对其内涵的界定，不同于以往一些学者仅关注其主观内容，笔者以便于司法实践的运用为宗旨，从主客观两个方面阐述了自己的观点；对其四个操作步骤的说明可以看出其不仅是一个证明标准，而且可以作为一种证明方法，对其在司法实践中所具有的可操作性我们将有一个比较直观的认识和理解。第三部分主要写如何有效地运用经验法则和逻辑规则对排除合理怀疑标准内涵的界定中所形成的两个争议点进行解释。对怀疑的合理性内涵和有罪判决结论唯一性的理解是把握排除合理怀疑标准的关键。不可否认，对这两个争议点有多重解释的角度，但运用经验法则和逻辑规则来阐释应该是最为主要的方式。对其中的关键问题，笔者运用多个案例加以说明，以便于理解。该部分是本文的重点。第四部分简单地叙写了与排除合理怀疑标准相关的配套措施的完善，以便于使其在实践中更好地运用。
[Abstract]:The standard of proof is the soul of the law of evidence, which is directly related to the quality of criminal judgment and the realization of judicial justice. How to correctly understand and apply the standard of proof is a difficult problem in judicial practice. The new Code of Criminal procedure absorbs reasonable doubt as a part of the standard of proof and makes it a kind of explanation that evidence is true and sufficient, which requires that the degree of beyond reasonable doubt should be reached when the evidence is true and sufficient. Under this background, it is of great significance to discuss the connotation and applicable method of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt. The text of this paper consists of four parts, a total of more than 19000 words. The main contents are as follows: the first part discusses the origin of China's reasonable doubt standard. This paper expounds how the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt is accepted by scholars step by step from the critical role and finally adopted by the legislator, and establishes a macroscopic knowledge background for the next part to explain the connotation of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt and the judicial application. The second part explains the connotation of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt, and emphatically discusses its concrete operation steps in judicial practice. The definition of its connotation is different from that some scholars only pay attention to its subjective content in the past. In order to facilitate the application of judicial practice, the author expounds his own views from two aspects: subjective and objective; The explanation of its four operation steps shows that it is not only a standard of proof, but also a method of proof. We will have a more intuitionistic understanding and understanding of its maneuverability in judicial practice. The third part mainly describes how to effectively use the rules of experience and logic to explain the two controversial points formed in the definition of the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. The understanding of the rationality connotation of doubt and the uniqueness of conclusion of guilty judgment is the key to grasp the criterion of eliminating reasonable doubt. There is no denying how many interpretations of these two controversial points, but the use of the rules of experience and logic to explain should be the most important way. In order to understand the key problems, the author uses several cases to explain them. This part is the focus of this paper. The fourth part simply describes the perfection of the relevant measures related to the elimination of reasonable doubt in order to make it better used in practice.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】