诉外调解协议司法确认制度的适用研究

发布时间：2018-07-07 19:32

本文选题：诉外调解协议 + 司法确认制度　；参考：《河南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：诉外调解协议司法确认制度(以下简称司法确认制度)是诉调对接机制的重要环节,是我国司法制度的创新。该制度的建立使得诉外调解协议具有强制执行力,打破了诉外调解协议效力不高的局面。新《民事诉讼法》施行以来,全国各地基层法院都不同程度地在运用司法确认制度,然而当前的法律和司法解释只对司法确认制度做了原则性和概括性的规定。通过查询相关材料和案例,笔者发现理论与实际还存在一定差距:由于司法确认制度是我国经过实践积累独创的一项司法制度,运行时间不长,相关理论研究还不充分,因此有关司法确认制度的适用范围、管辖法院、启动方式、审查方式与标准及救济等一系列问题有待进一步探讨。通过着重分析总结各地法院在适用司法确认制度方式上积累的经验,本文认为应继续对司法确认制度的适用规则做出完善,建立更为合理的调解与诉讼衔接机制。本文从司法确认制度存在的价值入手,阐述了司法确认制度的程序运作、适用状况和适用过程存在的问题,最后提出相应的完善措施,以期对司法确认制度的完善能有所裨益。除前言和结语外,本文共有五个部分。第一部分,分析司法确认制度的存在意义:(一)维护了当事人的合法权益;(二)扩张了法院的司法权威;(三)提高了司法资源利用率;(四)给基层调解提供有力的支持与保障;(五)使多元化纠纷解决机制更完善。第二部分,阐述司法确认制度的程序运作,包括适用范围、管辖法院、启动方式和审查等,全面介绍司法确认制度的运作过程。第三部分,通过比较分析总结出以甘肃省定西市、浙江省、湖南省等为代表的各地法院适用司法确认制度的经验现状,指出影响司法确认案件的因素:第一,自觉履行诉外调解协议的效率;第二,司法确认制度的熟知度及接受度;第三,司法确认制度本身程序运作的合理性。另通过对具体案例的罗列、研究,指出实践当中存在的问题:第一,司法确认裁决书的书写过程中存在大量不规范的现象;第二,有关司法确认案件的审查方式与审查标准还不统一;第三,与诉讼程序相混淆;第四,对当事人及案外人的权利保护较为混乱。第四部分,综合以上分析,指出司法确认制度在实际运用过程中存在的问题:(一)适用范围与管辖法院不尽合理;(二)司法确认的启动方式值得商榷;(三)司法确认的审查方式与审查标准不够明确;(四)司法确认裁决的既判力不清;(五)当事人及案外人的救济不足;(六)司法确认裁决书的表述中存在大量不规范的现象;(七)对司法确认制度的重视程度不够。第五部分,完善司法确认制度的路径构建。本部分从三个方面提出相应对策。一是明确诉外调解协议司法确认制度运行的原则,二是明确诉外调解协议司法确认制度具体适用,三是加大对司法确认制度的宣传引导。
[Abstract]:The judicial confirmation system of external mediation agreement (hereinafter referred to as judicial confirmation system) is an important link in the connection mechanism of litigation and mediation, and is the innovation of judicial system in our country. The establishment of the system makes the external mediation agreement compulsory execution, breaking the situation that the external mediation agreement is not effective. Since the implementation of the new Code of Civil procedure, the basic courts in various parts of the country have applied the judicial confirmation system to varying degrees. However, the current law and judicial interpretation only make the principle and general provisions for the judicial confirmation system. Through the inquiry of relevant materials and cases, the author finds that there is still a certain gap between the theory and practice: because the judicial confirmation system is a judicial system that has been accumulated and created by practice in our country, the running time is not long, and the relevant theoretical research is not sufficient. Therefore, the application scope of judicial confirmation system, the jurisdiction of the court, the way of starting, the way of examination and standard, the relief and so on need to be further discussed. Through the analysis and summary of the experience accumulated by the courts in the application of judicial confirmation system, this paper holds that we should continue to perfect the applicable rules of the judicial confirmation system and establish a more reasonable mechanism of conciliation and litigation convergence. Starting with the value of the judicial confirmation system, this paper expounds the procedure operation, the application situation and the problems existing in the application process of the judicial confirmation system, and finally puts forward the corresponding consummation measures in order to be beneficial to the perfection of the judicial confirmation system. In addition to the preface and conclusion, there are five parts in this paper. Part one, This paper analyzes the existence significance of judicial confirmation system: (1) safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties; (2) expanding the judicial authority of the court; (3) improving the utilization rate of judicial resources; (4) providing effective support and protection to the grassroots mediation Obstacle; (5) make the diversification dispute resolution mechanism more perfect. The second part expounds the procedure operation of judicial confirmation system, including the scope of application, the jurisdiction of the court, the starting mode and the examination, and introduces the operation process of the judicial confirmation system in an all-round way. The third part, through comparative analysis, summarizes the experience of judicial confirmation system applied by courts in Dingxi City, Zhejiang Province and Hunan Province, Gansu Province, and points out the factors that affect judicial confirmation cases: first, Second, the degree of familiarity and acceptance of the judicial confirmation system; third, the rationality of the procedure operation of the judicial confirmation system itself. In addition, by listing and studying the specific cases, this paper points out the problems in practice: first, there are a large number of irregularities in the process of writing the judicial confirmation award; second, The examination method of the judicial confirmation case is not unified with the standard of review; third, it is confused with the procedure; fourth, the protection of the rights of the parties and the outsiders in the case is confused. The fourth part, synthesizes the above analysis, This paper points out the problems existing in the practical application of the judicial confirmation system: (1) the scope of application and the jurisdiction of the court are unreasonable; (2) the starting mode of the judicial confirmation is open to question; (3) the mode of examination and the standard of the judicial confirmation are discussed. It is not clear enough; (4) the res judicata of the judicial confirmation decision is not clear; (5) the relief of the parties and outsiders in the case is insufficient; (6) there is a large number of irregularities in the expression of the judicial confirmation award; (7) the degree of attention to the judicial confirmation system is not enough. The fifth part, perfect the path construction of judicial confirmation system. This part puts forward corresponding countermeasures from three aspects. The first is to make clear the principles of the judicial confirmation system of the external mediation agreement, the second is to make clear the specific application of the judicial confirmation system of the external mediation agreement, and the third is to increase the publicity and guidance to the judicial confirmation system.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】