论民事诉讼中的法官释明权

发布时间：2018-07-07 19:48

本文选题：释明权 + 辩论主义　；参考：《海南大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 法官释明权制度是大陆法系国家民事诉讼中的重要制度,在我国民事诉讼中也有着举足轻重的作用。辩论主义和处分主义是法官释明权制度的基础,通过法官释明可以有效弥补当事人主义的种种弊端,从而公正高效地解决纠纷。我国在民事审判方式的改革中本着“司法为民”的宗旨不断强化当事人的主体地位,但是我国当事人诉讼能力参差不齐且国内没有实行律师强制代理制度,具体诉讼操作中仍需由法官引导,这样才能保证实质正义和程序公正。因此我国该怎样规范法官释明权行使已引起了学术界和实务界的广泛关注。本文拟借我国民事审判改革之机,从理论与实务角度来探究法官释明权的相关问题,以期规范我国民事诉讼中的法官释明权。本文除引言和结语外共分五个部分：第一部分：法官释明权的一般理论。通过介绍法官释明权的内涵、分类及价值,对法官释明权有一个基本的了解和定位。第二部分：法官释明权的域外立法概况。通过介绍域外主要国家和地区关于法官释明权的立法概况,比较分析它们的共同点,得出在诉讼中加强法官的管理、引导作用是两大法系主要国家和地区共同的选择和发展趋势。第三部分：法官释明权与相关理论的关系。通过介绍法官释明权与辩论主义、处分主义的关系指出辩论主义、处分主义是法官释明权进行的基础,同时法官释明权又对它们具有促进作用；通过介绍法官释明权与诉讼指挥权的关系可以更进一步证实法官释明权是民事诉讼程序中的重要组成部分。第四部分：我国法官释明权的现状考察。通过对我国法官释明权的立法及司法现状、它们存在的缺陷、以及存在这些缺陷的原因进行分析,指出我国有存在法官释明权制度的必要。第五部分：我国法官释明权制度的立法规范。在我国司法改革的过程中,笔者通过借鉴国外先进立法和司法经验,结合我国实际情况,从立法上为规范法官释明权行使提出一些建议,希望这些粗陋的建议能为我国法官释明权制度的规范提供有效的借鉴。
[Abstract]:The system of judge's right of interpretation is an important system in civil litigation in civil law countries, and also plays an important role in civil litigation in our country. Argumentalism and disciplinary doctrine are the basis of the system of the judge's interpretation of the right, through which the judge's explanation can effectively make up for the malpractice of the litigant doctrine and solve the dispute fairly and efficiently. In the reform of the way of civil trial, our country constantly strengthens the principal position of the parties in line with the aim of "the administration of justice for the people", but the litigants' capacity of litigation in our country is uneven and the system of compulsory representation of lawyers has not been implemented in our country. In order to ensure substantive justice and procedural justice, it is still necessary for the judge to guide the specific litigation operation. Therefore, how to regulate the exercise of judges' right of interpretation has aroused widespread concern in academic and practical circles. This article intends to use the opportunity of our country's civil trial reform to probe into the relevant problems of the judge's right of interpretation from the angle of theory and practice, in order to standardize the judge's right of interpretation in our country's civil litigation. This paper is divided into five parts except introduction and conclusion: the first part: the general theory of the judge's right of interpretation. By introducing the connotation, classification and value of the judge's right of interpretation, there is a basic understanding and orientation of the right of the judge's interpretation. The second part: the general situation of the extraterritorial legislation of the judge's power of interpretation. By introducing the legislative survey of the judges' interpretation power in the main countries and regions of foreign countries and regions, and comparing and analyzing their common points, it is concluded that the management of judges should be strengthened in the litigation. The leading role is the common choice and development trend of the two major legal system countries and regions. The third part: the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and relevant theories. By introducing the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and the doctrine of debate, the author points out that the doctrine of disposition is the basis of the judge's right of interpretation, and at the same time, the right of the judge's interpretation plays an important role in promoting them. By introducing the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and the right of command, it can be further proved that the right of interpretation is an important part of the civil procedure. The fourth part: the investigation of the present situation of the judge's right of interpretation in our country. Based on the analysis of the legislation and judicial status of the judges' right of interpretation in our country, their defects and the reasons for these defects, it is pointed out that there is a necessity for the existence of the system of the judges' power of interpretation in our country. The fifth part: our country judge interprets the power system the legislative norm. In the process of judicial reform in our country, the author, by drawing lessons from the advanced legislation and judicial experience of foreign countries and combining the actual situation of our country, puts forward some suggestions for standardizing the exercise of the judge's right of interpretation from the legislative point of view. It is hoped that these crude suggestions can provide effective reference for the norms of the system of interpretation of judges in our country.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】