当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

民事诉讼督促程序法律研究

发布时间:2018-07-10 19:39

  本文选题:督促程序 + 程序效益 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:督促程序作为一种纠纷快速解决机制,在他国发挥着良好的效益,极大地缓解案件剧增的压力,但在我国,督促程序却因其设计欠缺等因素而成为一道虚置程序。为激活督促程序应有的诉讼效益,实现其诉讼价值,使其得到良好的运行,本文立足于民事诉讼法对于督促程序的修改,反思督促程序在过去运行中所处的窘境,,细化督促程序的适用,力求使其真正实现本次民事诉讼法对其修改所赋予的期望。 第一部分为督促程序的概述。首先对其进行明确定义,并提出笔者对于督促程序性质的认识。其次,分析督促程序设立的立法目的与法理基础,明确督促程序的诉讼效益。最后,回顾我国对于督促程序适用的立法进程。 第二部分为分析督促程序在民事诉讼法修改前所面临的适用困境。从当事人怠于适用督促程序与法院缺乏适用督促程序的积极性从而使较多本应适用该程序的案件被分化两方面入手,发现督促程序在民事诉讼法修订前的适用问题。 第三部分为剖析本次民诉法对于督促程序的修改。首先,立足本次民诉法对于督促程序的调整,分析程序改良的进步之处以及是否解决就修法前督促程序虚置所存在的问题予以解决。其次,分析此次修改可能带来的众多问题,分别从程序请求权、启动机制、程序衔接、重复审查等多方面入手,发现此次程序修改所可能带来的问题。 第四部分为督促程序比较研究。借鉴德国、日本及台湾地区适用督促程序的特点,分别从启动机制、支付令异议、异议审查、程序衔接四方面入手,与我国现行督促程序的适用进行比较研究,从而分析其各自的价值取向及利弊。 第五部分:构建我国督促程序的规范化运作。借鉴他国经验之上,立足于我国实际,对于督促程序的运行进行细化。从督促程序的启动—异议审查—程序衔接三方面进行展开,细化运行环节,力求使督促程序可以得到良好运行。
[Abstract]:As a kind of quick dispute resolution mechanism, the supervision procedure plays a good role in other countries and greatly alleviates the pressure of the sharp increase of cases. However, in our country, the supervision procedure becomes a false procedure because of its lack of design and other factors. In order to activate the lawsuit benefit of supervision procedure, realize its lawsuit value and make it run well, this paper bases on the modification of supervision procedure in civil procedure law, and reflects on the dilemma of supervision procedure in the past. The application of the detailed supervision procedure is to fulfill the expectation of this civil procedure law. The first part is the summary of supervision procedure. Firstly, it is clearly defined, and the author's understanding of the nature of supervision procedure is put forward. Secondly, it analyzes the legislative purpose and legal basis of the establishment of the supervision procedure, and clarifies the litigation benefit of the supervision procedure. Finally, review our country to supervise and urge the procedure to apply the legislative process. The second part is the analysis of the supervision procedure in the civil procedure law before the revision of the difficulties faced by the application. Starting from the two aspects of the parties' slacking on the application of supervision procedure and the lack of enthusiasm of the court to apply the supervision procedure so as to divide more cases that should be applied to the procedure, the author finds out the application of the supervision procedure before the revision of the civil procedure law. The third part is the analysis of the civil action law for the amendment of the supervision procedure. Firstly, based on the adjustment of the supervision procedure, the paper analyzes the progress of the procedure improvement and whether to solve the existing problems before the law amendment. Secondly, this paper analyzes many problems that may be brought about by this amendment, starting from the claim of procedure, starting mechanism, program convergence, repeated examination and so on, and finds out the problems that may be brought about by the modification of the procedure. The fourth part is the comparative study of the supervision procedure. Drawing lessons from the characteristics of the applicable supervision procedures in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, starting from the four aspects of the starting mechanism, the dissent of payment orders, the examination of dissent, and the convergence of procedures, this paper makes a comparative study with the application of the current supervision procedures in our country. Thus, it analyzes their respective value orientation and advantages and disadvantages. Part five: constructing the standardized operation of supervision procedure in our country. Learn from the experience of other countries, based on the reality of our country, the operation of the supervision process to be refined. In order to make the prodication program run well, it is carried out from three aspects, starting-up-dissenting examination-procedure linking up with supervision and urging procedure, in order to refine the running link.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.18

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 章武生;督促程序的改革与完善[J];法学研究;2002年02期

2 李丰安;;督促程序的破灭与再生——以支付令异议审查制度的完善为视角[J];山东大学法律评论;2012年00期



本文编号:2114460

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2114460.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a61b8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com