我国民事证据采信法定化检视
发布时间：2018-07-18 08:16
【摘要】：随着民事审判方式改革的深入，我国民事证据采信制度立法中的相关证据规则在司法实务的适用中，存在着对证据证明力的评价过于形式化的法定证据制度运作的现状。本文立足于我国当前这一司法现状，力图从立法层面及实证层面进行问题的探析，，以求在理论与实务的剖析中找寻成因，即理论中以“客观真实”与“法律真实”的二元真实观为切入，实务中则以法官受制于制度规则、管理体制和考核制度等因素而不得对证据证明力作出自由心证式评价的典型案例来加以分析，并阐述了民事证据采信法定化在审判实践中的危害。从而，在立法剖析与实证分析的基础上，为了消减我国民事证据采信活动中存在的法定证据的运用情形，我们可以从规则层面、公开心证和法官独立三个方面进行相应的制度和体制完善。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the reform of the civil trial mode, there exists the current situation of the operation of the legal evidence system which is too formalized in the evaluation of the evidential power in the application of the relevant evidence rules in the legislation of the civil evidence acceptance system in our country. Based on the current judicial situation in China, this paper tries to explore the problems from the legislative and empirical levels, in order to find the causes of formation in the analysis of theory and practice. That is, in theory, the dual view of "objective reality" and "legal truth" is taken as the entry, and in practice, the judge is subject to the rules of the system. The factors such as management system and assessment system can not be used to analyze the typical cases in which the evidence proof can not be evaluated freely, and the harm of the legalization of civil evidence adoption in the trial practice is expounded. Therefore, on the basis of legislative analysis and empirical analysis, in order to reduce the use of legal evidence in the civil evidence acceptance activities in China, we can from the level of rules. Open-minded evidence and the independence of judges three aspects of the corresponding system and system improvement.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2131299
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the reform of the civil trial mode, there exists the current situation of the operation of the legal evidence system which is too formalized in the evaluation of the evidential power in the application of the relevant evidence rules in the legislation of the civil evidence acceptance system in our country. Based on the current judicial situation in China, this paper tries to explore the problems from the legislative and empirical levels, in order to find the causes of formation in the analysis of theory and practice. That is, in theory, the dual view of "objective reality" and "legal truth" is taken as the entry, and in practice, the judge is subject to the rules of the system. The factors such as management system and assessment system can not be used to analyze the typical cases in which the evidence proof can not be evaluated freely, and the harm of the legalization of civil evidence adoption in the trial practice is expounded. Therefore, on the basis of legislative analysis and empirical analysis, in order to reduce the use of legal evidence in the civil evidence acceptance activities in China, we can from the level of rules. Open-minded evidence and the independence of judges three aspects of the corresponding system and system improvement.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏泽林;李轩;;论司法统一与案例指导制度的完善[J];中国司法;2009年12期
2 梁三利;郭明;;法院管理模式比较——基于对英国、德国、法国的考察[J];长江师范学院学报;2010年01期
3 张卫平;论我国法院体制的非行政化——法院体制改革的一种基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年03期
4 苏力;法官素质与法学院的教育[J];法商研究;2004年03期
5 孙霞;谁是法官的上司?院长还是法律?——论法官独立审判的实现[J];法学评论;2002年04期
6 张永泉;;客观真实价值观是证据制度的灵魂——对法律真实观的反思[J];法学评论;2012年01期
7 王申;;司法行政化管理与法官独立审判[J];法学;2010年06期
8 廖中洪;;“心证公开”及其在中国的适用[J];贵州社会科学;2007年08期
9 李峰;;传闻证据规则,抑或直接言词原则?——民事诉讼书面证言处理的路径选择[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年04期
10 蒋惠岭;;论审判独立的最低保障标准[J];法律适用;2013年07期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 锁秀秀;我国法官绩效考评制度研究[D];海南大学;2013年
本文编号：2131299
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2131299.html
