认罪认罚从宽的程序性推进

发布时间：2018-07-31 19:06

【摘要】：认罪认罚从宽顶层设计和制度推进的关键在于让一线办案人员有现实选择的标准和可供切实操作的程序指引。不能将认罪认罚概括为一个原则或制度名称,将其简单地糅合到既有的程序当中去。相较于已有的规定和程序,认罪认罚从宽应着重强调其特质性内容并一以贯之地进行技术规则的补充完善,一方面应按照认罪与不认罪进行程序区分,另一方面在整体设计上应体现程序的逐渐简化内容,从而使繁简分离于具体程序的选择和运行中。中国式认罪认罚的构建要注意制度背景差异和实践运行效果要求,同时要避免可能产生的程序疏漏,在律师实质辩护的制度保障下,真正实现其繁简分流的价值取向与立法任务。
[Abstract]:The key to the design and promotion of the system from the broad top level of guilty admission and punishment lies in the practical choice of standards and procedural guidelines for practical operation by front-line case handlers. Confession and punishment cannot be summed up as a principle or system name, which can be simply mixed into existing procedures. Compared with the existing provisions and procedures, the lenient admission of guilt and punishment should emphasize its characteristic content and complement and perfect the technical rules in a consistent manner. On the one hand, the distinction should be made according to the admission of guilt and non-admission of guilt. On the other hand, the whole design should reflect the gradual simplification of the program so as to separate the complexity from the selection and operation of the specific program. The construction of Chinese guilty admission and punishment should pay attention to the difference of system background and the requirement of practical operation effect, at the same time, it should avoid the possible procedure omission, under the system guarantee of the lawyer's substantive defense. To realize the value orientation and legislative task of its complexity and simplification.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学法律学院;
【基金】：国家社科一般项目“刑事言词证据的危险性及其与刑事错案的关联研究”(项目号16BFX093) 司法部课题“排除合理怀疑证明标准的实践适用研究”(项目号13SFB3019)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】