民事诉讼释明制度研究

发布时间：2018-08-04 21:33

【摘要】：释明一词,对我国而言是一个不折不扣的“舶来品”,它源于德国,发展和演变肇始于大陆法系的相关立法实践和理论研究。释明制度因在诉讼程序中发挥着举足轻重的作用而被赋予“保护当事人权利的大宪章”之美称,许多法治发达的国家在其民事诉讼法中都做了专门规定。我国对释明权理论研究起步较晚,理论界对释明权的研究基本仍停滞在对大陆法系相关制度和理论介绍的层面,从释明概念被引入至今,学界一直在努力推进国际视野下的释明制度理论与我国司法实践的现实结合和深入研究,只可惜研究进程略显缓慢,目前在构建符合我国司法实践需要的制度创新方面依然建树不大,尚需进一步深化。文章在对释明相关规定介绍和研究的同时,将以往被学界争论不休的学说、论点进行梳理和提炼,进而对完善民事诉讼释明制度的相关问题予以必要的讨论和论证,以期在我国司法体制改革的关键时期对构建完善的释明制度略尽绵薄之力。文章以释明制度的基础理论开篇,从释明的概念、性质及功能入手阐明了释明制度的理论基础,将诉讼指挥权、辩论原则、处分原则和释明制度之间的关系进行了理论性的辨析;接下来对释明制度在大陆法系和英美法系的域外发展做了简单介绍和比较分析;然后着重分析了释明制度在我国立法和司法实践中的现状以及释明权不能正确行使的原因;进而提出一些建议,从完善释明内容和制定相应的配套措施两方面对释明制度进行完善。为了正确引导民事诉讼的有效进行、保障当事人平等参加诉讼的权利,最终实现司法公正、社会和谐的法治现代化目标,作为法治意识强烈的高素质法律人才,我们有必要集思广益、开拓思路,对现实中有争议的问题和新出现的问题进行深入考虑,进而和谐地解决民事诉讼中有关释明权行使的相关问题,及早构建适合我国司法特点的完善的释明制度。
[Abstract]:To our country, the word "interpretation" is an "import", it originated from Germany, and its development and evolution began with the relevant legislative practice and theoretical research of the civil law system. The interpretation system is endowed with the laudatory title of "Magna Carta to protect the Rights of the parties" because it plays an important role in the litigation procedure, and many developed countries with the rule of law have made special provisions in their civil procedure law. The theoretical research on the right of interpretation in China started relatively late, and the theoretical research on the right of interpretation is still basically stagnant in the level of the relevant systems and theories of the civil law system, and the concept of interpretation has been introduced to this day. Scholars have been trying to promote the international perspective of the interpretation system theory and judicial practice of China's practical integration and in-depth research, but unfortunately the research process is slightly slow. At present, there are not many achievements in constructing the system innovation which meets the needs of judicial practice in our country, and it needs to be further deepened. The article introduces and studies the relevant regulations of interpretation, combs and refines the theories and arguments that have been debated in academic circles in the past, and then makes necessary discussion and demonstration on the relevant issues of perfecting the system of interpretation of civil action. In order to build a perfect interpretation system in the key period of judicial system reform in China. The article begins with the basic theory of the interpretation system, and expounds the theoretical basis of the interpretation system from the concept, nature and function of the interpretation system. The relationship between the principle of disposition and the system of interpretation is analyzed theoretically, and then the development of the system of interpretation in the continental law system and the common law system is briefly introduced and compared. Then it analyzes the current situation of the interpretation system in the legislative and judicial practice of our country and the reasons why the interpretation power can not be exercised correctly, and then puts forward some suggestions. Improve the interpretation system from two aspects: perfecting the explanation content and formulating the corresponding supporting measures. In order to correctly guide the effective conduct of civil proceedings, to ensure the right of the parties to participate in the proceedings on an equal footing, and finally to realize the goal of the modernization of the rule of law of judicial justice and social harmony, as a highly qualified legal talent with a strong sense of rule of law, It is necessary for us to brainstorm and develop ideas, to consider deeply the controversial and emerging issues in reality, and then to resolve harmoniously the relevant issues related to the exercise of the right of interpretation in civil proceedings. Establish a perfect interpretation system suitable for the judicial characteristics of our country as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】