我国民事执行权分权制约的路径选择与程序衔接

发布时间：2018-08-05 09:35

【摘要】：随着"执行工作裁执分离改革"地方实践的正式启动,我国执行体制改革由审执分离进一步细化至裁执分离。这一举措不仅有利于改善我国多年来的"执行难"问题,通过分权制约更有助于破解"执行乱"的困局。在具体模式的选择上,采取"法院外适当分离"的模式更有利于实现改革的价值目标,即对于民事案件执行,适当地采取内部深化方式,将执行实施权、执行裁决权分别交由特定的人员和组织行使,从机构划分、事项划分以及人员划分构建民事执行权的边界。同时应理顺执行局与执行裁判庭在执行实务中的关系,加强两权之间的协作配合,以确保执行程序与执行裁判程序的顺畅衔接。
[Abstract]:With the official start of the local practice of "the reform of the separation of execution and enforcement", the reform of execution system in China has been further refined from the separation of adjudication and enforcement to the separation of adjudication and enforcement. This measure not only helps to improve the problem of "difficult execution" for many years in our country, but also helps to solve the dilemma of "execution disorder" through the restriction of separation of powers. In the choice of specific mode, the mode of "proper separation outside the court" is more conducive to the realization of the value goal of the reform, that is, for the civil case execution, appropriate internal deepening mode will be adopted, and the enforcement power will be implemented. The power of execution and adjudication is exercised by specific personnel and organizations, and the boundary of civil execution power is constructed from organization division, event division and personnel division. At the same time, it is necessary to straighten out the relationship between the executive board and the executive tribunal in the practice of execution, and strengthen the cooperation between the two powers in order to ensure the smooth connection between the execution procedure and the execution decision procedure.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学学报编辑部;
【基金】：国家“十三五”重点研发计划“司法鉴定意见证据评价系统研究”(2016YFC0800707) 国家社会科学基金青年项目“强制医疗制度诉讼化建构研究”(14CFX070) 华东政法大学2015年度校级科研项目“民事执行权的控制研究——基于英国视角的考察”(15HZK007)
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】