当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论诉讼时效中断规则的适用

发布时间:2018-08-08 18:33
【摘要】:诉讼时效中断制度作为一项各国民事立法不可或缺的重要法律制度,其核心价值在于督促债权人积极主张权利,维护稳定的社会经济秩序。然而,就我国现行立法来说,关于诉讼时效中断规则的内容仍存在一些缺漏与矛盾之处,与实践的脱节导致司法实务的客观需求无法满足。此外,学术界对诉讼时效中断适用规则的诸多争议问题也存在较多分歧。本文通过对大量诉讼时效中断制度研究成果的梳理,结合对具体案例的分析与思考,以我国诉讼时效中断的事由及其适用问题为主线进行探究,同时对大陆法系国家与英美法系国家关于诉讼时效中断问题的相关规定进行对比借鉴,以期指出我国诉讼时效中断规则适用中的问题,并对我国的诉讼时效中断规则的适用提出完善建议。本文第一部分为诉讼时效中断制度概述,阐述诉讼时效中断制度的内涵,分析诉讼时效中断制度的基本特征,探求诉讼时效中断制度的源流,并阐释其制度存在的价值。本文第二部分为请求方式引起时效中断的规则适用问题,就其适用的主体、客体、方式及意思表示的到达等具体问题展开研究。本文第三部分为起诉和承认方式引起诉讼时效中断的具体适用问题。就起诉而言,起诉的扩张解释,起诉中断诉讼时效的时间点,以及起诉后又撤诉、不予受理、驳回起诉情形下诉讼时效中断的认定等争议问题的分析解决;就承认而言,从含义、构成要件和方式三个方面阐述承认引起诉讼时效中断的问题。本文第四部分,从我国诉讼时效中断规则适用的现状入手,分析其所具有浓厚的中国特色,并指出我国诉讼时效中断适用的不足之处,并提出一些完善的对策,为更好的适用我国诉讼时效中断规则提供支持。
[Abstract]:As an indispensable important legal system of civil legislation in various countries, the system of limitation interruption of action is an important legal system, whose core value lies in urging creditors to actively claim their rights and to maintain a stable social and economic order. However, as far as the current legislation of our country is concerned, there are still some deficiencies and contradictions in the content of the rule of interruption of limitation of action, and the disconnection with practice leads to the impersonal demand of judicial practice being unable to meet. In addition, there are many disputes in academic circles about the rules of limitation interruption. By combing the research results of a large number of limitation interruption system, combining with the analysis and thinking of specific cases, this paper probes into the cause of the limitation interruption and its application in our country. At the same time, it makes a comparison between the civil law countries and the common law countries about the interruption of the limitation of action, in order to point out the problems in the application of the rules of the interruption of the limitation of action in our country. And put forward the perfect suggestion to our country's limitation interruption rule application. The first part of this paper is an overview of the system of limitation interruption of action, expounds the connotation of the system of interruption of limitation of action, analyzes the basic characteristics of the system of interruption of limitation of action, probes into the origin of the system of interruption of limitation of action, and explains the value of its existence. The second part of this paper deals with the application of the rules of limitation interruption caused by the request mode, and studies the specific problems such as the subject, the object, the way and the arrival of the expression of intention. The third part is about the specific application of the limitation interruption caused by the mode of prosecution and recognition. As far as the prosecution is concerned, the expanded interpretation of the prosecution, the time point at which the limitation of action is interrupted, the withdrawal of the suit after the prosecution, the inadmissibility of the action, the determination of the interruption of the statute of limitations in the case of dismissal of the prosecution, etc., are analyzed and resolved; as far as recognition is concerned, This paper expounds the problems of the interruption of limitation of action caused by recognition from three aspects of meaning, constitution and mode. The fourth part of this paper, starting with the current situation of the application of the limitation interruption rule in our country, analyzes its strong Chinese characteristics, points out the deficiencies of the limitation interruption application in our country, and puts forward some perfect countermeasures. To provide support for the better application of the statute of limitations interruption of our country.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 曹志勋;;起诉中断诉讼时效规则的理论展开[J];当代法学;2014年06期

2 霍海红;;撤诉的诉讼时效后果[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年05期

3 尹田;;我国诉讼时效之立法模式评价[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年05期

4 王轶;;诉讼时效制度三论[J];法律适用;2008年11期

5 韩松;焦和平;;对我国《民法通则》关于起诉引起诉讼时效中断规定的反思与重构[J];法学论坛;2006年05期

6 戚兆岳;论诉讼时效中断事由[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2005年05期

7 董翠香;中日民法消灭时效制度比较[J];山东社会科学;2005年07期

8 冯恺;论诉讼时效的不完成[J];法学杂志;2005年01期

9 刘贵祥;诉讼时效若干理论与实务问题研究[J];法律适用;2004年02期

10 李建华,杨代雄,赵军;论我国物权请求权诉讼时效制度的立法选择——兼评《中华人民共和国民法(草案)》的相关规定[J];法学评论;2003年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 吴庆宝;;诉讼时效中断的司法认定(上)[N];人民法院报;2009年

2 李永锋;;引起诉讼时效中断的承认的认定标准[N];人民法院报;2007年



本文编号:2172658

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2172658.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1821e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com