刑事诉讼法中的侦查概括条款

发布时间：2018-08-15 17:30

【摘要】：大陆法系国家和地区普遍规定了侦查概括条款,规定这一条款的重要原因是兼顾法律保留原则和侦查程序自由形成原则。从性质而言,侦查概括条款既是任务分配规范,也是一般授权规范。因此,侦查概括条款不仅具有抽象的任务指示功能,还有具体的措施授权功能,但这一授权功能仅处于补遗地位。与大陆法系法治发达国家相比,我国的侦查概括条款存在着任务指示功能明显,措施授权功能不彰;侦查概括条款和证据收集概括条款并列规定,内容重复;特别授权条款的数量和规范密度不足,难以保障侦查概括条款的明确性等问题。我国立法机关应当正视上述问题,在借鉴其他国家侦查措施立法经验的基础上,进一步完善侦查程序立法。
[Abstract]:The countries and regions of civil law system generally stipulate the general clause of investigation. The important reason for the stipulation of this clause is that the principle of law reservation and the principle of free formation of investigation procedure are taken into account. From the nature, the general clause of investigation is not only the norm of task assignment, but also the norm of general authorization. Therefore, the general clause of investigation not only has the function of abstract task indication, but also has the function of specific measure authorization, but the function of authorization is only in the position of supplement. Compared with the developed countries with the rule of law in the civil law system, the general investigation clause in our country has the obvious function of task instruction, the function of the measure authorization is not obvious, the summary clause of investigation and the summary clause of evidence collection are parallel provisions, and the content is repeated. The quantity and normative density of special authorization clauses are not enough, so it is difficult to guarantee the clarity of the general clauses of investigation and so on. The legislative organs of our country should face the above problems squarely and perfect the legislation of investigation procedure on the basis of drawing lessons from the legislative experience of other countries' investigative measures.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金重点项目“刑事诉讼法解释学的原理及运用研究”(14AFX014) 2016年西南政法大学引进人才科研资助项目“侦查程序法治化与公民基本权利保障问题研究”(2016-XZRCXM006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】