非法证据排除规则在侦查阶段的实施

发布时间：2018-08-18 14:15

【摘要】：2016年,党的十八届四中全会首次提出推进“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革。随后,为进一步完善我国刑事诉讼制度,根据中央关于深化司法体制和工作机制改革的总体部署,“完善非法证据排除制度,明确非法证据排除的范围,证明责任、审查程序和救济途径等”纳入司法改革事项。本论文将分析论证侦查阶段排除非法证据这一理念的合理性以及非法证据排除规则在侦查阶段如何具体实施的问题。中国的刑事诉讼程序分为三阶段,即侦查阶段、审查起诉阶段和审判阶段。从法律上来说,这三个阶段是相对独立的,虽然检察机关作为法律监督机关,具有相应的监督职权,但是,无论从案件的办理深入程度来说,还是检察机关自身力量来说,都不可能完全的对三个阶段中的每一起案件“全方位不留死角”的监督。因此,仅仅就刑事诉讼的侦查阶段而言,相对于国外的警察机构,我国公安机关本身就拥有决定并实施侦查措施的权力,因此必须建立具有自身特色的证据审查制度。在此,本论文对侦查阶段排除非法证据的正当性予以论证,对这一规则在实施中存在的问题进行分析,进而提出侦查阶段排除非法证据机制及相关配套措施的建议。推进以“审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革是我国未来刑事司法制度改革的前进方向,侦查阶段排除非法证据的规定正是此项改革精神的最好展现。因此我们必须有磨砺前行的勇气,坚定地将此项规则落实在每一起刑事案件中,切切实实回应好人民群众对保障人权和司法公正的需求。
[Abstract]:In 2016, the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee for the first time proposed to promote the "trial-centric" litigation system reform. Subsequently, in order to further improve our criminal procedure system, according to the overall arrangement of the central authorities on deepening the reform of the judicial system and the working mechanism, "perfecting the system of excluding illegal evidence, clarifying the scope of the exclusion of illegal evidence, and the burden of proof," Review procedures and remedies, etc., "should be incorporated into the matter of judicial reform." This paper will analyze the rationality of the idea of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage and how to implement the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in the investigation stage. The criminal procedure in China is divided into three stages, namely, the investigation stage, the examination and prosecution stage and the trial stage. Legally speaking, these three stages are relatively independent. Although the procuratorial organ, as a legal supervisory organ, has corresponding supervisory powers, however, whether from the depth of handling the case or from the power of the procuratorial organ itself, It is impossible to completely supervise every case in the three stages. Therefore, as far as the investigation stage of criminal proceedings is concerned, the public security organs in our country have the power to decide and implement the investigation measures compared with the foreign police organs, so we must establish the evidence examination system with its own characteristics. In this paper, the legitimacy of the exclusion of illegal evidence in the investigation stage is demonstrated, the problems existing in the implementation of this rule are analyzed, and the mechanism of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage and the relevant supporting measures are put forward. To promote the reform of litigation system with "trial as the center" is the forward direction of our country's criminal justice system reform in the future. The rule of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage is the best manifestation of this reform spirit. Therefore, we must have the courage to hone our way forward, firmly implement this rule in every criminal case, and respond to the needs of the people for the protection of human rights and justice.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】