当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

新刑诉法视野下的刑事律师辩护权实现研究

发布时间:2018-08-23 12:11
【摘要】:程序决定着公正。刑事律师辩护权的保障直接影响着诉讼程序能否公正的进行,更与公民的合法权利是否会受到公私权力的恣意侵犯紧密相关。很长一段时间,在法律制度和司法实务中,刑事律师的辩护权问题一直处于尴尬局面。相关立法机关虽然制定了一系列保障律师权利的法律法规,但从权利实践现状来看,在很大的程度上还是治标不治本。而树立正确的权利本位观念已成为一种趋势,不仅保护了律师的辩护权,并且体现了被追诉人的人权保障。国家应从制度上强化对公权力的制约,防止权力过度膨胀滥用而侵害律师合法权利的行使,完善权力制约机制,在实践中监督司法机关、行政机关依法行使职权,保障律师权利,以期提高律师投身诉讼活动的积极性,进一步推进我国的司法文明建设。本文立足新刑诉实施以后的诉讼现状,分五个章节叙述律师辩护权,第一章绪论,主要阐述国内外律师辩护权的相关法律制度;第二章具体介绍会见通信权、阅卷权和调查取证权从1996年刑诉、2008年新《律师法》到2012年新刑诉以来的发展变化,直观了解辩护权的内容;第三章分析目前诉讼活动中会见权、阅卷权和调查取证权在法律制度上和实践中的进步性与存在的问题及表现,也是本文的核心内容;第四章从宏观、微观角度剖析出现上述问题的原因,宏观角度有司法环境、诉讼体制、立法缺陷、滥用执法权和律协律所管理有限五个方面,微观则是从律师队伍自身找原因,第五章是面对这些问题,针对症结,提出改善的想法、建议,以谋求法律法规规定的律师辩护权能得到真正意义上的实现,而不是纸上谈兵。
[Abstract]:Procedure determines justice. The guarantee of the criminal lawyer's right of defense directly affects whether the procedure can be carried out fairly, and it is closely related to whether the citizen's legal rights will be infringed by the public and private rights. For a long time, in the legal system and judicial practice, the defense rights of criminal lawyers have been in an awkward situation. Although the relevant legislative organs have formulated a series of laws and regulations to protect the rights of lawyers, but from the current situation of practice of rights, to a large extent, it is still to a large extent to deal with the symptoms and not the root causes. It has become a trend to establish the right standard concept, which not only protects the lawyer's right to defense, but also embodies the human rights guarantee of the accused. The state should strengthen the restriction on the public power from the system, prevent the excessive expansion and abuse of the power and encroach on the exercise of the lawyer's legal right, perfect the power restriction mechanism, supervise the judicial organ and the administrative organ to exercise their functions and powers according to law in practice. To protect lawyers' rights, to improve the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in litigation activities, and to further promote the construction of judicial civilization in China. Based on the status quo of the litigation after the implementation of the new criminal suit, this paper describes the lawyer's right to defense in five chapters, the first chapter is an introduction, mainly describes the domestic and foreign lawyers' right to defend the relevant legal system; the second chapter specifically introduces the right to meet with the communication, The rights of reading papers and collecting evidence from 1996, 2008, 2008 to 2012, the development and changes of the right to defense, the third chapter analyzes the right to meet in the current litigation activities, It is also the core content of this paper to analyze the reasons of the above problems from the macro and micro angles, and the judicial environment from the macro and micro angles. The progress and the existing problems and the performance of the right of marking and collecting evidence in the legal system and in practice are also the core contents of this paper, the fourth chapter analyzes the reasons for the above problems from the macro and micro angles. There are five aspects of litigation system, legislative defects, abuse of law enforcement power and limited management of the law association law firms. In the fifth chapter, in the face of these problems, we put forward some ideas and suggestions for improvement in the face of these problems. In order to seek the lawyer's right of defense as stipulated by laws and regulations, it can be realized in real sense rather than on paper.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陶宝玉;;浅论辩护律师阅卷权制度的完善[J];法制博览;2016年02期

2 胡玮瑶;;论刑事诉讼中辩方违法取证的责任追究——以“放宽下限制”为改革进路[J];宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版);2015年06期

3 林琳;;辩护律师权利的保障与救济——以我国新《刑事诉讼法》背景下检察机关发挥法律监督为视角[J];法学杂志;2015年11期

4 陈琪莹;;论律师权利保障——以法官与律师关系为视角[J];法制与社会;2015年23期

5 孙远;;论侦查阶段辩护律师的阅卷权[J];法律适用;2015年02期

6 何朔;;律师会见权的限制与保障——以“特别重大贿赂犯罪案件”为例[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年10期

7 杨晓静;丁延松;常明明;;侦查阶段辩护律师调查取证权行使的界域及律师执业规范导引[J];山东社会科学;2014年10期

8 刘天龙;;试论新刑诉法视野下新型检律关系的构建[J];老区建设;2014年18期

9 陈瑞华;;辩护律师调查取证的三种模式[J];法商研究;2014年01期

10 黄文旭;袁博;周嫣;;论刑事辩护律师会见权的实现[J];中国刑事法杂志;2013年12期

相关重要报纸文章 前7条

1 赵春艳;;最高法发布《依法切实保障律师诉讼权利的规定》[N];民主与法制时报;2016年

2 罗书臻;;依法切实保障律师诉讼权利[N];人民法院报;2016年

3 陈光中;;推进“以审判为中心”改革的几个问题[N];人民法院报;2015年

4 于欣华;王涛;;律师刑事辩护权浅议[N];法制日报;2012年

5 刘金林;;“法律的生命在于不折不扣地实施”[N];检察日报;2012年

6 陈卫东;;辩护权的发展完善与刑诉法再修改[N];法制日报;2011年

7 刘文;;刑诉法修改应建立证据展示制度[N];民主与法制时报;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 丁亚红;审判中心视域下我国侦检关系定位研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年

2 王琼;辩护律师的调查取证权[D];华东政法大学;2014年

3 杨倩倩;探析刑辩律师的执业困境及其风险防范[D];安徽大学;2014年

4 赵玉静;辩护律师调查取证权研究[D];山东大学;2012年

5 姜洪涛;我国辩护律师调查取证权的救济、保障与规范[D];中国政法大学;2010年

6 刘颖异;论刑事诉讼中律师的调查取证权[D];西南政法大学;2008年

7 邓心刚;论我国辩护律师的权利及完善[D];中国政法大学;2007年



本文编号:2199048

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2199048.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户471af***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com