刑事抗诉制度研究

发布时间：2018-08-28 14:45

【摘要】：刑事抗诉制度是人民检察院认为人民法院的刑事判决或裁定确有错误时，依照法定诉讼程序，要求人民法院重新审理并改判的一种法律监督制度。刑事抗诉包括二审程序的刑事抗诉和审判监督程序的刑事抗诉两种。刑事抗诉权作为公诉权的一项重要权能,是刑事诉讼法赋予检察机关的一项重要的刑事审判监督职能。当然刑事抗诉不仅具有诉讼监督功能，同时还有犯罪追诉功能和诉讼教育功能，刑事抗诉的价值追求就是把三重价值功能有效地发挥出来。我国法律赋予了检察机关较为广泛的法律监督职能享有较为广泛的抗诉权，这既符合我国的国家性质，也符合我国的诉讼理念。然而在司法实践中，由于刑事抗诉制度研究不足，我国法律体系的不健全等原因致使我国的刑事抗诉制度存在很多的问题，直接影响了我国法治建设。在司法实践中我国刑事抗诉制度在立法层面存在很多的问题。在司法实践中，刑事审判监督权与公诉权的直接合一，在很大程度上都淡化了人民检察院正确积极的行使抗诉权。在人民法院方面，法院的内部保护主义，，法院上级请示现象都阻碍着检察机关积极正确行使刑事抗诉权。立法层面，抗诉机制等方面存在的问题都严重阻碍着我国检察机关正确积极行使抗诉权，因此，进一步完善我国刑事抗诉制度应经迫在眉睫。针对我国刑事抗诉制度所存在的问题，笔者通过自己的研究提出了一些有益对策，如确立完善我国抗诉制度应坚持的原则，进一步明确刑事抗诉的条件，扩大检察机关刑事抗诉案件的范围，确立明确规定检察长列席同级人民法院审判委员会讨论抗诉案件的制度。
[Abstract]:The criminal protest system is a kind of legal supervision system that the people's procuratorate thinks that the criminal judgment or ruling of the people's court is wrong and requires the people's court to try and revise the sentence again according to the legal procedure. Criminal protest includes criminal protest of second instance procedure and criminal protest of trial supervision procedure. As an important power of public prosecution, criminal protest right is an important function of criminal trial supervision given to procuratorial organs by criminal procedure law. Of course, the criminal protest not only has the function of lawsuit supervision, but also has the function of criminal prosecution and litigation education. The value pursuit of criminal protest is to give full play to the function of triple value. The law of our country has given the procuratorial organ extensive legal supervision function to enjoy the more extensive right of protest, which not only accords with the national nature of our country, but also accords with the litigation idea of our country. However, in judicial practice, due to the lack of research on the criminal protest system and the unsound legal system of our country, there are many problems in the criminal protest system of our country, which directly affects the construction of the rule of law in our country. In the judicial practice, there are many problems in the system of criminal protest in our country. In judicial practice, the direct integration of the right of criminal trial supervision and the right of public prosecution, to a great extent, has weakened the people's procuratorate's right to exercise the right of protest correctly and actively. In the aspect of people's court, the internal protectionism of the court and the request of the superior of the court all hinder the procuratorial organ from exercising the right of criminal protest actively and correctly. At the legislative level, the problems existing in the mechanism of protest seriously hinder the procuratorial organs to exercise the right of protest correctly and actively. Therefore, it is urgent to further improve the system of criminal protest in our country. In view of the problems existing in our country's criminal protest system, the author puts forward some useful countermeasures through his own research, such as establishing the principles that should be adhered to in the perfection of our country's protest system, and further clarifying the conditions for criminal protest. To expand the scope of criminal protest cases of procuratorial organs and to establish a system of clear provisions for the procurator to attend the same level of people's court trial committee to discuss protest cases.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】