死刑复核程序全面审查原则的反思
发布时间：2018-09-02 08:21
【摘要】：我国死刑复核程序目前实行全面审查原则,既审理法律问题也审理事实问题。刑事诉讼法本身并没有要求死刑复核程序实行全面审查。由于刑事诉讼中绝对真实不可能实现,对事实的反复审理不但浪费大量的司法资源,与最高法院的职责不符,而且无法避免的事实误认将对最高法院的权威构成伤害。因此,最高法院死刑复核程序应当限于法律问题的审理,即法律适用问题和程序违法的后果问题。
[Abstract]:At present, the procedure of death penalty review in our country is based on the principle of comprehensive examination, which tries both legal and factual issues. The Code of Criminal procedure itself does not require a comprehensive review of the death penalty review procedure. Because it is absolutely impossible to realize the truth in criminal proceedings, the repeated trial of facts not only wastes a large number of judicial resources, and does not conform to the duties of the Supreme Court, but also the unavoidable mistake of facts will harm the authority of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Supreme Court's death penalty review procedure should be limited to the trial of legal issues, that is, the application of law and the consequences of procedural violations.
【作者单位】： "2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：中国政法大学青年创新团队项目“死刑的程序控制”的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:At present, the procedure of death penalty review in our country is based on the principle of comprehensive examination, which tries both legal and factual issues. The Code of Criminal procedure itself does not require a comprehensive review of the death penalty review procedure. Because it is absolutely impossible to realize the truth in criminal proceedings, the repeated trial of facts not only wastes a large number of judicial resources, and does not conform to the duties of the Supreme Court, but also the unavoidable mistake of facts will harm the authority of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Supreme Court's death penalty review procedure should be limited to the trial of legal issues, that is, the application of law and the consequences of procedural violations.
【作者单位】： "2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：中国政法大学青年创新团队项目“死刑的程序控制”的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜保忠;;司法裁判中法律问题与事实问题的区分——以两起影响性诉讼为样本[J];理论与改革;2008年06期
2 曹国英;;从上诉的目的看我国审级制度的改造和重构[J];理论导刊;2006年06期
3 林莉红;论行政诉讼中的事实、法律问题[J];当代法学;1998年05期
4 方丽冬;卢婧Z，
本文编号：2218800
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2218800.html
