民事再审检察建议的适用与完善
发布时间：2018-09-13 14:36
【摘要】：民事检察建议在民事检察工作中发挥着重要作用,我国《民事诉讼法》确立了民事再审检察建议的法律地位,将其明确规定为与抗诉相并列的检察监督方式,使检察监督得到进一步完善。但是《民事诉讼法》对再审检察建议的规定却较为笼统,在立法上存在一定的缺陷。诸如民事再审检察建议的适用范围界定模糊,抹灭了其作为抗诉补充手段的效果;再审检察建议刚性不足,立法未明确授予再审检察建议程序上的强制力,法院在接收到再审检察建议后应该如何回应;再审检察建议与抗诉是两种不同的监督方式,如何处理好二者之间的关系;再审检察建议应对法院有一定的约束力、再审检察建议发出后检察机关又应如何保障其效力的发挥等问题都值得探讨。民事再审检察建议的发展应以法律为支撑,针对我国现行《民事诉讼法》关于民事再审检察建议规定中的不足,完善立法势在必行。本文将对再审检察建议存在的基础与价值进行分析,肯定再审检察建议的作用,指出现行法律存在的不足,并结合再审检察建议在司法实践运用过程中遇到问题提出进一步完善的建议与措施。
[Abstract]:The civil procuratorial suggestion plays an important role in the civil procuratorial work. Our Civil procedure Law establishes the legal status of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal, which is clearly defined as the procuratorial supervision mode juxtaposed with the protest. The procuratorial supervision has been further improved. However, the provisions of Civil procedure Law on retrial procuratorial suggestions are general, and there are some defects in legislation. For example, the scope of application of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal is vague, and the effect of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal as a supplementary means of protest is obliterated; the retrial procuratorial proposal is not rigid enough, and the legislation does not explicitly confer on the retrial procuratorial proposal the compulsory force in the procedure. How should the court respond after receiving the retrial procuratorial proposal; the retrial procuratorial proposal and the protest are two different ways of supervision and how to handle the relationship between the two; the retrial procuratorial proposal should have certain binding force on the court. How to ensure the effectiveness of procuratorial organs after the retrial of procuratorial suggestions is worth discussing. The development of the procuratorial proposal of civil retrial should be supported by the law. It is imperative to perfect the legislation in view of the deficiency in the provisions of the current Civil procedure Law on the procuratorial suggestion of civil retrial. This article will analyze the basis and value of the retrial procuratorial suggestion, confirm the function of the retrial procuratorial suggestion, point out the deficiency of the current law, In the light of the problems encountered in the judicial practice, some suggestions and measures are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.1
本文编号：2241458
[Abstract]:The civil procuratorial suggestion plays an important role in the civil procuratorial work. Our Civil procedure Law establishes the legal status of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal, which is clearly defined as the procuratorial supervision mode juxtaposed with the protest. The procuratorial supervision has been further improved. However, the provisions of Civil procedure Law on retrial procuratorial suggestions are general, and there are some defects in legislation. For example, the scope of application of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal is vague, and the effect of the civil retrial procuratorial proposal as a supplementary means of protest is obliterated; the retrial procuratorial proposal is not rigid enough, and the legislation does not explicitly confer on the retrial procuratorial proposal the compulsory force in the procedure. How should the court respond after receiving the retrial procuratorial proposal; the retrial procuratorial proposal and the protest are two different ways of supervision and how to handle the relationship between the two; the retrial procuratorial proposal should have certain binding force on the court. How to ensure the effectiveness of procuratorial organs after the retrial of procuratorial suggestions is worth discussing. The development of the procuratorial proposal of civil retrial should be supported by the law. It is imperative to perfect the legislation in view of the deficiency in the provisions of the current Civil procedure Law on the procuratorial suggestion of civil retrial. This article will analyze the basis and value of the retrial procuratorial suggestion, confirm the function of the retrial procuratorial suggestion, point out the deficiency of the current law, In the light of the problems encountered in the judicial practice, some suggestions and measures are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 高欣欣;;关于适用民事再审检察建议的调研报告——以南京地区13个基层检察院适用情况为例[J];四川警察学院学报;2012年06期
2 廖中洪;;关于完善《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法修正案(草案)》有关“检察建议”规定的若干问题[J];西南政法大学学报;2012年03期
3 刘铁流;;检察机关检察建议实施情况调研[J];人民检察;2011年02期
4 郑红;;检察建议立法化研究[J];人民检察;2010年14期
5 逯奎岳;;职务犯罪预防中如何更好地运用检察建议[J];法制与社会;2010年12期
6 朱春莉;;检察建议的实践运用与规范[J];人民检察;2009年06期
7 吴锋;孔丽丽;;民事再审检察建议的问题与出路[J];人民检察;2008年14期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王骁;论民事诉讼中的检察建议[D];华中师范大学;2013年
2 常丽;民事检察建议——从试点到制度构建[D];中国政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2241458
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2241458.html
