我国的附条件不起诉制度研究

发布时间：2018-09-14 18:17

【摘要】：2012年3月14日,十一届全国人大五次会议通过了《关于修改中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法的决定》,新刑事诉讼法于2013年1月1日起正式实施,其专章对未成年人刑事案件诉讼程序进行了规定,并在其中正式确立了附条件不起诉制度。这一制度的建立,赋予了检察机关在处理未成年人案件上更大的自由裁量权,充分体现了未成年人刑事司法中非刑罚化的处理原则和对未成年人犯罪嫌疑人的特别保护政策,是正确贯彻宽严相济刑事司法政策的必然结果,其不仅填补了我国在刑事诉讼法当中不起诉制度的不足,更对未成年人的健康成长,对尊重和保障人权,维护社会和谐稳定均具有重大意义。但是,新刑事诉讼法实施近两年以来,附条件不起诉制度在理论界引发了一些讨论,在司法实践中也显现出一些困境,新刑诉法关于这一制度的规定过于单薄,显现出一些当前立法和司法实践亟需解决的问题。本文拟以新刑事诉讼法的实施为视角,分三个部分对我国附条件不起诉制度作出简要分析,并提出完善建议。第一部分：附条件不起诉制度的一般理论。包括附条件不起诉制度的概念、价值和确立附条件不起诉制度的必要性和意义等；第二部分：域外附条件不起诉及类似制度之比较。阐述德、日、美、英、台等区域的附条件不起诉及类似制度,并总结其立法和司法实践方面的好的经验；第三部分：对我国附条件不起诉制度的思考及完善建议。结合我国新刑事诉讼法实施近一年来附条件不起诉制度运行的情况,分析我国附条件不起诉制度中存在的问题和实践困境,在此基础上,借鉴域外好的立法和司法经验,对我国现行附条件不起诉制度提出完善之建议。
[Abstract]:On March 14, 2012, the Fifth session of the Eleventh National people's Congress adopted the decision on the revision of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, which came into effect on January 1, 2013. Its special chapter prescribes the procedure of juvenile criminal cases, and formally establishes the system of non-prosecution with conditions. The establishment of this system endows the procuratorial organs with greater discretion in dealing with minor cases, and fully embodies the principle of non-penal treatment of juvenile criminal justice and the special protection policy for juvenile criminal suspects. It is the inevitable result of the correct implementation of the criminal justice policy of combining leniency with severity. It not only fills the deficiencies of the non-prosecution system in our criminal procedure law, but also makes up for the healthy growth of minors and the respect and protection of human rights. It is of great significance to maintain social harmony and stability. However, since the implementation of the new criminal procedure law for nearly two years, the system of conditional non-prosecution has aroused some discussion in the theoretical circle, and has also revealed some difficulties in judicial practice. The provisions of the new criminal procedure law on this system are too weak. There are some problems that need to be solved in the current legislation and judicial practice. From the perspective of the implementation of the new criminal procedure law, this paper makes a brief analysis of the system of conditional non-prosecution in three parts, and puts forward some suggestions to improve it. The first part: the general theory of conditional non-prosecution system. It includes the concept of conditional non-prosecution system, its value and the necessity and significance of establishing conditional non-prosecution system. The second part: the comparison of extraterritorial conditional non-prosecution and similar systems. This paper expounds the conditional non-prosecution and similar systems in Germany, Japan, the United States, Britain, Taiwan and other regions, and summarizes its good experience in legislation and judicial practice. The third part: reflections and suggestions on the system of conditional non-prosecution in China. Combined with the operation of conditional non-prosecution system in China's new criminal procedure law for nearly a year, this paper analyzes the existing problems and practical difficulties in China's conditional non-prosecution system, and on this basis, draws lessons from good legislation and judicial experience of foreign countries. To our country present condition does not sue the system to put forward the consummation proposal.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】